Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XHSvsPBEETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) belongs to the US Health Care segment. Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) is part of the BioTech & Genomics segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. XHS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.58% for PBE. XHS is down -1.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. PBE performs worse with -3.89% YTD performance, and +$135K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XHS and PBE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XHS vs PBE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XHS PBE | -0.71%-3.57% | -2.04%-1.26% | -1.55%-3.89% | +11.15%+20.46% | +26.55%+31.83% | +1.67%+10.46% |
| Flows | XHS PBE | -$8M-$3M | +$2M+$969K | +$6M+$135K | -$3M-$32M | -$36M-$56M | -$38M-$39M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XHS PBE | +17.76%+18.21% | +19.20%+22.16% | +18.15%+20.15% | +21.13%+22.81% |
| Max drawdown | XHS PBE | -5.98%-9.23% | -12.54%-16.18% | -17.78%-22.21% | -32.53%-34.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | XHS PBE | 63d62d | 128d107d | 362d324d | 1716d1540d |
XHS | PBE | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $104.90 | $78.26 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $105.14 | $78.82 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XHS | PBE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XHS | PBE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $104.90 | $78.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $87.35 M | $249.34 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.58% |
XHS | PBE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index | Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 30 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2011 | June 23, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XHS and PBE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, XHS is down -1.55% year-to-date (YTD), while PBE has lost -3.89%. That puts XHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XHS or PBE?
Year-to-date, the XHS ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$135K for PBE.
Which ETF is more volatile: XHS or PBE?
Over the past year, XHS had a volatility of 19.2%, while PBE experienced 22.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: XHS or PBE?
As of March 10, 2026, XHS holds $87.35 M in assets under management (AUM), while PBE manages $249.34 M.
What sectors do the XHS and PBE ETFs invest in?
XHS leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, PBE focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XHS ETF and PBE ETF?
XHS top holdings include BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, ALIGNMENT HEALTHCARE and US20603L1026. PBE holds in its top three: ILLUMINA, GILEAD SCIENCES and AMGEN-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: XHS or PBE?
XHS holds 59 securities with 33.22% of its assets in the top 15. PBE has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.48%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
