Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XHSvsGNOMETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) belongs to the US Health Care segment. Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF - USD (GNOM) is part of the BioTech & Genomics segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. XHS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.5% for GNOM. XHS is down -1.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. GNOM performs better with -0.14% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XHS and GNOM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XHS vs GNOM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XHS GNOM | -0.71%-1.95% | -2.04%-2.77% | -1.55%-0.14% | +11.15%+31.18% | +26.55%-2.20% | +1.67%-49.04% |
| Flows | XHS GNOM | -$8M- | +$2M-$4M | +$6M-$2M | -$3M-$19M | -$36M-$115M | -$38M+$13M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XHS GNOM | +17.76%+23.39% | +19.20%+30.06% | +18.15%+28.58% | +21.13%+33.54% |
| Max drawdown | XHS GNOM | -5.98%-10.49% | -12.54%-22.14% | -17.78%-46.50% | -32.53%-72.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | XHS GNOM | 63d47d | 128d113d | 362d1030d | 1716d1713d |
XHS | GNOM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $104.90 | $45.00 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $105.14 | $45.33 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XHS | GNOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XHS | GNOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $104.90 | $45.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.74% |
| AuM | $87.35 M | $49.78 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.5% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XHS and GNOM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, XHS is down -1.55% year-to-date (YTD), while GNOM has lost -0.14%. That puts GNOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XHS or GNOM?
Year-to-date, the XHS ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to -$2M for GNOM.
Which ETF is more volatile: XHS or GNOM?
Over the past year, XHS had a volatility of 19.2%, while GNOM experienced 30.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: XHS or GNOM?
As of March 10, 2026, XHS holds $87.35 M in assets under management (AUM), while GNOM manages $49.78 M.
What sectors do the XHS and GNOM ETFs invest in?
XHS leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, GNOM focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XHS ETF and GNOM ETF?
XHS top holdings include BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, ALIGNMENT HEALTHCARE and US20603L1026. GNOM holds in its top three: MODERNA INC, ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC and US74006W2070.
Which ETF is more diversified: XHS or GNOM?
XHS holds 59 securities with 33.22% of its assets in the top 15. GNOM has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.95%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
