Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XEMLvsEZUETF Comparison
Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF (XEML) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) belong to the same industry segment: Europe Blended Cap. XEML's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, EZU's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. XEML is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.5% for EZU. XEML is up 0% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. EZU performs worse with -1.78% YTD performance, and +$652M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XEML and EZU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XEML vs EZU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEML EZU | -6.15%-6.88% | n/a-0.61% | +0.00%-1.78% | n/a+19.21% | n/a+61.00% | n/a+55.80% |
| Flows | XEML EZU | -+$229M | -+$887M | -+$652M | --$368M | --$617M | -+$2.33B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XEML EZU | n/a+15.95% | n/a+17.50% | n/a+16.03% | n/a+19.06% |
| Max drawdown | XEML EZU | n/a-9.03% | n/a-14.55% | n/a-14.68% | n/a-36.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | XEML EZU | n/a15d | n/a44d | n/a153d | n/a901d |
XEML | EZU | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.58 | $62.17 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $24.96 | $62.99 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XEML | EZU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XEML | EZU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.58 | $62.17 |
| 1D performance | -1.52% | -1.30% |
| AuM | $5.03 M | $9.37 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.5% |
XEML | EZU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | STOXX Europe Total Market Leaders Index | MSCI EMU Index |
| N° of holdings | 37 | 213 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 23, 2025 | July 25, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XEML and EZU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, XEML is up 0% year-to-date (YTD), while EZU has lost -1.78%. That puts XEML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XEML or EZU?
Year-to-date, the XEML ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$652M for EZU.
Which ETF is bigger: XEML or EZU?
As of March 11, 2026, XEML holds $5.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while EZU manages $9.37 B.
What sectors do the XEML and EZU ETFs invest in?
XEML leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, EZU focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the XEML ETF and EZU ETF?
XEML top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ABB and DK0062498333. EZU holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, SIEMENS and SAP SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEML or EZU?
XEML holds 40 securities with 68.55% of its assets in the top 15. EZU has 227 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.02%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
