Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XCLRvsXYLGETF Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. XCLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.35% for XYLG. XCLR is down -1.22% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XYLG performs better with 0.32% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XCLR and XYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XCLR vs XYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCLR XYLG | -2.23%-1.21% | -1.98%+0.63% | -1.22%+0.32% | +12.96%+18.15% | +52.81%+61.54% | n/a+65.22% |
| Flows | XCLR XYLG | --$276K | -+$5M | -+$2M | +$234K+$1M | -$1M+$8M | -+$64M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XCLR XYLG | +9.07%+9.25% | +10.30%+15.74% | +10.14%+12.19% | n/a+13.93% |
| Max drawdown | XCLR XYLG | -2.90%-2.31% | -6.24%-12.29% | -12.48%-17.16% | n/a-21.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | XCLR XYLG | 41d13d | 45d48d | 153d154d | n/a736d |
XCLR | XYLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.57 | $27.28 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $26.60 | $27.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XCLR | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XCLR | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.57 | $27.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.14% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $3.20 M | $64.19 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XCLR and XYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, XCLR is down -1.22% year-to-date (YTD), while XYLG has returned 0.32%. That puts XYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XCLR or XYLG?
Year-to-date, the XCLR ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$2M for XYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: XCLR or XYLG?
Over the past year, XCLR had a volatility of 10.3%, while XYLG experienced 15.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: XCLR or XYLG?
As of March 10, 2026, XCLR holds $3.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while XYLG manages $64.19 M.
What sectors do the XCLR and XYLG ETFs invest in?
XCLR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the XCLR ETF and XYLG ETF?
XCLR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCLR or XYLG?
XCLR holds 501 securities with 43.68% of its assets in the top 15. XYLG has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
