Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XCLRvsXRMIETF Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. XCLR's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, XRMI's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. XCLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.6% for XRMI. XCLR is down -1.22% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XRMI performs better with 0.76% YTD performance, and +$159K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XCLR and XRMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XCLR vs XRMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCLR XRMI | -2.23%-0.36% | -1.98%+1.78% | -1.22%+0.76% | +12.96%+7.27% | +52.81%+25.18% | n/an/a |
| Flows | XCLR XRMI | -+$1M | -+$159K | -+$159K | +$234K+$270K | -$1M+$23M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XCLR XRMI | +9.07%+4.88% | +10.30%+5.82% | +10.14%+5.69% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | XCLR XRMI | -2.90%-1.10% | -6.24%-4.81% | -12.48%-7.98% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XCLR XRMI | 41d4d | 45d135d | 153d274d | n/an/a |
XCLR | XRMI | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.57 | $17.69 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $26.60 | $17.69 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XCLR | XRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XCLR | XRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.57 | $17.69 |
| 1D performance | -0.14% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $3.20 M | $43.30 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.6% |
XCLR | XRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Benchmark | Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index | Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index |
| N° of holdings | 478 | 479 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 25, 2021 | August 25, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XCLR and XRMI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, XCLR is down -1.22% year-to-date (YTD), while XRMI has returned 0.76%. That puts XRMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XCLR or XRMI?
Year-to-date, the XCLR ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$159K for XRMI.
Which ETF is more volatile: XCLR or XRMI?
Over the past year, XCLR had a volatility of 10.3%, while XRMI experienced 5.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: XCLR or XRMI?
As of March 10, 2026, XCLR holds $3.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while XRMI manages $43.30 M.
What sectors do the XCLR and XRMI ETFs invest in?
XCLR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XRMI focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the XCLR ETF and XRMI ETF?
XCLR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XRMI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCLR or XRMI?
XCLR holds 501 securities with 43.68% of its assets in the top 15. XRMI has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.48%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
