XCEMvsGEMETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
+0.24%
Columbia EM ex-China ETF (XCEM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. XCEM's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, GEM's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. XCEM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.59% for GEM. XCEM is up 23.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$414M in YTD flows. GEM performs worse with 14.25% YTD performance, and +$312M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XCEM and GEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XCEM vs GEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCEM GEM | -9.60%-9.37% | -3.70%-4.72% | +23.86%+14.25% | +29.45%+16.84% | +92.96%+79.77% | +62.75%+39.08% |
| Flows | XCEM GEM | +$53M+$28M | +$84M+$52M | +$414M+$312M | +$374M+$343M | +$839M+$224M | +$1.29B+$93M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XCEM GEM | +26.13%+21.61% | +26.32%+23.28% | +18.85%+17.55% | +17.41%+16.78% |
| Max drawdown | XCEM GEM | -10.40%-9.56% | -17.06%-13.50% | -17.68%-14.73% | -28.36%-31.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | XCEM GEM | 17d44d | 123d57d | 251d223d | 888d1071d |
Trading data
XCEM | GEM | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.45 | $47.55 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $47.40 | $47.34 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XCEM | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XCEM | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.45 | $47.55 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | +0.44% |
| AuM | $1.98 B | $1.67 B |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
XCEM | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI Beta Thematic Emerging Markets ex-China Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 476 | 718 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 2, 2015 | September 25, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XCEM
Taiwan
35.08%
Republic of Korea
24.7%
India
14.39%
Other
25.83%
GEM
Taiwan
24.08%
Republic of Korea
18.43%
China
17.83%
India
9.88%
Other
29.78%
Sectors
XCEM
Technology
46.59%
Finance
19.71%
Industrials
8.77%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.93%
Other
17%
GEM
Technology
40.28%
Finance
19.88%
Other
39.85%
Advertisement
Diversification
XCEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.93%
GEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
XCEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
15.26%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
8.80%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.40%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.45%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.38%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.08%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.01%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
1.00%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.89%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
0.82%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.81%
International Holding Co. PJSC
0.80%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.80%
Unimicron Technology Corp.
0.76%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.67%
GEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.94%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.54%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.36%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.59%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.68%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.32%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.84%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.74%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.67%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.47%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.46%
King Slide Works Co., Ltd.
0.39%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.39%
Frequently asked questions about XCEM and GEM
How have the XCEM and GEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, XCEM is up 23.86% year-to-date (YTD), while GEM has returned 14.25%. That puts XCEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XCEM or GEM?
Year-to-date, the XCEM ETF saw +$414M in flows, compared to +$312M for GEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: XCEM or GEM?
Over the past year, XCEM had a volatility of 26.32%, while GEM experienced 23.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: XCEM or GEM?
As of October 23, 2026, XCEM holds $1.98 B in assets under management (AUM), while GEM manages $1.67 B.
What sectors do the XCEM and GEM ETFs invest in?
XCEM leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, GEM focuses on Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the XCEM ETF and GEM ETF?
XCEM top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. GEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCEM or GEM?
XCEM holds 479 securities with 38.93% of its assets in the top 15. GEM has 740 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.34%.
Advertisement
Latest news about XCEM & GEM
Advertisement
