XCEMvsEMGFETF Comparison
VS
Columbia EM ex-China ETF (XCEM) and iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. XCEM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.26% for EMGF. XCEM is up 23.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$414M in YTD flows. EMGF performs worse with 15.43% YTD performance, and +$305M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XCEM and EMGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XCEM vs EMGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCEM EMGF | -9.60%-9.00% | -3.70%-4.32% | +23.86%+15.43% | +29.45%+17.12% | +92.96%+87.20% | +62.75%+51.47% |
| Flows | XCEM EMGF | +$53M+$13M | +$84M+$42M | +$414M+$305M | +$374M+$356M | +$839M+$748M | +$1.29B+$798M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XCEM EMGF | +26.13%+20.86% | +26.32%+23.09% | +18.85%+17.66% | +17.41%+16.88% |
| Max drawdown | XCEM EMGF | -10.40%-10.70% | -17.06%-14.42% | -17.68%-16.15% | -28.36%-26.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | XCEM EMGF | 17d31d | 123d123d | 251d220d | 888d902d |
Trading data
XCEM | EMGF | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.45 | $66.52 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $47.40 | $66.23 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XCEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XCEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.45 | $66.52 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | +0.43% |
| AuM | $1.98 B | $1.81 B |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
XCEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI Beta Thematic Emerging Markets ex-China Index | STOXX Emerging Markets Equity Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 476 | 654 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 2, 2015 | December 8, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XCEM
Taiwan
35.08%
Republic of Korea
24.7%
India
14.39%
Other
25.83%
EMGF
Taiwan
25.59%
China
20.53%
Republic of Korea
20.45%
India
12.33%
Other
21.1%
Sectors
XCEM
Technology
46.59%
Finance
19.71%
Industrials
8.77%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.93%
Other
17%
EMGF
Technology
41.04%
Finance
21.08%
Industrials
7.52%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.05%
Other
16.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
XCEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.93%
EMGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.22%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
XCEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
15.26%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
8.80%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.40%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.45%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.38%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.08%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.01%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
1.00%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.89%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
0.82%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.81%
International Holding Co. PJSC
0.80%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.80%
Unimicron Technology Corp.
0.76%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.67%
EMGF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
10.31%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.80%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.51%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.72%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.96%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.50%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.02%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.00%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.76%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.66%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.65%
Bank of China Ltd.
0.62%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.61%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
0.56%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.55%
Frequently asked questions about XCEM and EMGF
How have the XCEM and EMGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, XCEM is up 23.86% year-to-date (YTD), while EMGF has returned 15.43%. That puts XCEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XCEM or EMGF?
Year-to-date, the XCEM ETF saw +$414M in flows, compared to +$305M for EMGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: XCEM or EMGF?
Over the past year, XCEM had a volatility of 26.32%, while EMGF experienced 23.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: XCEM or EMGF?
As of October 23, 2026, XCEM holds $1.98 B in assets under management (AUM), while EMGF manages $1.81 B.
What sectors do the XCEM and EMGF ETFs invest in?
XCEM leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, EMGF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the XCEM ETF and EMGF ETF?
XCEM top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. EMGF holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCEM or EMGF?
XCEM holds 479 securities with 38.93% of its assets in the top 15. EMGF has 671 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.22%.
Advertisement
Latest news about XCEM & EMGF
Advertisement
