WTMUvsFTMSETF Comparison
WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal Fund (WTMU) and Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. WTMU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.22% for FTMS. WTMU is down -0.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. FTMS performs better with 0.25% YTD performance, and +$29M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of WTMU and FTMS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
WTMU vs FTMS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | WTMU FTMS | -0.18%+0.02% | -0.63%-0.29% | -0.14%+0.25% | +3.05%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | WTMU FTMS | --$997K | -$2M+$8M | +$3M+$29M | +$4M- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | WTMU FTMS | +1.98%+1.22% | +2.02%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | WTMU FTMS | -1.63%-0.77% | -2.67%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | WTMU FTMS | 53d59d | 183dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
WTMU | FTMS | |
Last sale 8/31/2026 at 2:08 PM | $25.12 | $9.91 |
| Previous close 08/28/2026 | $25.15 | $9.90 |
| Consolidated volume 08/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
WTMU | FTMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.12 | $9.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $9.08 M | $190.65 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.22% |
WTMU | FTMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | WisdomTree | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 18 | 48 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2025 | October 24, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
