Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
WBIFvsRUNNETF Comparison
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) belong to the same industry segment: Uncategorized Equities. WBIF's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, RUNN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. WBIF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.73%, versus 0.58% for RUNN. WBIF is up 3.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. RUNN performs worse with -3.03% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of WBIF and RUNN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
WBIF vs RUNN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | WBIF RUNN | -1.21%-3.59% | +1.94%-4.18% | +3.14%-3.03% | +12.13%+1.56% | +23.64%n/a | +10.72%n/a |
| Flows | WBIF RUNN | -$1M+$6M | -$3M+$13M | -$1M+$8M | -$9M+$64M | -$20M- | -$14M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | WBIF RUNN | +11.08%+14.15% | +13.99%+16.65% | +12.35%n/a | +12.81%n/a |
| Max drawdown | WBIF RUNN | -3.22%-7.77% | -12.33%-10.93% | -16.98%n/a | -20.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | WBIF RUNN | 11d32d | 89d45d | 289dn/a | 1272dn/a |
WBIF | RUNN | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.91 | $32.39 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $31.93 | $32.34 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
WBIF | RUNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.91 | $32.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | +0.13% |
| AuM | $23.88 M | $365.70 M |
| E/R | 1.73% | 0.58% |
WBIF | RUNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | WBI Shares | Running Oak Capital |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 76 | 52 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 25, 2014 | June 8, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the WBIF and RUNN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, WBIF is up 3.14% year-to-date (YTD), while RUNN has lost -3.03%. That puts WBIF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: WBIF or RUNN?
Year-to-date, the WBIF ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$8M for RUNN.
Which ETF is more volatile: WBIF or RUNN?
Over the past year, WBIF had a volatility of 13.99%, while RUNN experienced 16.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: WBIF or RUNN?
As of March 13, 2026, WBIF holds $23.88 M in assets under management (AUM), while RUNN manages $365.70 M.
What sectors do the WBIF and RUNN ETFs invest in?
WBIF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, RUNN focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the WBIF ETF and RUNN ETF?
WBIF top holdings include MUELLER INDUSTRIES, YUM CHINA HOLDINGS and PRIMERICA. RUNN holds in its top three: DECKERS OUTDOOR, TELEDYNE TECH and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: WBIF or RUNN?
WBIF holds 79 securities with 26.08% of its assets in the top 15. RUNN has 52 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.44%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
