Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

WBIFvsCLSEETF Comparison

ETF 1
WBIF

WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF

This fund is part of
Uncategorized Equities
-0.72%
VS
ETF 2
CLSE

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.45%

WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is part of the Alternatives segment. WBIF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, CLSE's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. WBIF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.73%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. WBIF is up 15.2% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 23.09% YTD performance, and +$396M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of WBIF and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

WBIF vs CLSE performance and flow charts

Performance

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Jun 17Jun 25Jul 2Jul 10Jul 17

Cumulative Flows

0 M20 M40 M60 M80 MJun 17Jun 25Jul 2Jul 10Jul 17

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
WBIF
CLSE
+1.75%-1.22%
+8.16%+9.94%
+15.20%+23.09%
+22.34%+44.91%
+23.45%+114.73%
+21.09%n/a
Flows
WBIF
CLSE
-+$70M
-$3M+$263M
-$4M+$396M
-$10M+$446M
-$26M+$584M
-$30M-
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
WBIF
CLSE
+13.16%+13.56%
+12.54%+13.42%
+12.56%+13.55%
+12.86%n/a
Max drawdown
WBIF
CLSE
-2.73%-3.47%
-6.59%-4.60%
-16.98%-15.76%
-20.16%n/a
Max drawdown duration
WBIF
CLSE
31d25d
46d40d
289d188d
1272dn/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
WBIF
CLSE
Last sale
7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
$35.62
$33.71
Previous close
07/16/2026
$35.85
$33.79
Consolidated volume
07/16/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
WBIF
CLSE
Last price
$35.62
$33.71
1D performance
-0.64%
-0.24%
AuM$23.46 M$753.14 M
E/R1.73%1.52%
Characteristics
WBIF
CLSE
Management strategyActiveActive
ProviderWBI SharesConvergence Investment Partners LLC
Benchmark--
N° of holdings73684
Asset class--
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateAugust 25, 2014February 22, 2022
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

WBIF
USA
89.36%
Other
10.64%
CLSE
Data will be available soon

Sectors

WBIF
Technology
33.56%
Finance
21.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.14%
Industrials
8.32%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.22%
Other
17.16%
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

WBIF

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

36.1%
CLSE
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of May 31, 2026
WBIF
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.85%
Amphenol Corp.
2.85%
Southern Copper Corp.
2.76%
Piper Sandler Cos.
2.54%
Ball Corp.
2.52%
Lennox International, Inc.
2.49%
Oracle Corp.
2.45%
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
2.40%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
2.28%
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
2.28%
Murphy USA, Inc.
2.23%
American Express Co.
2.21%
McKesson Corp.
2.16%
Tradeweb Markets, Inc.
2.16%
Somnigroup International, Inc.
1.92%
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about WBIF and CLSE

How have the WBIF and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 17, 2026, WBIF is up 15.2% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 23.09%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: WBIF or CLSE?

Year-to-date, the WBIF ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$396M for CLSE.

Which ETF is more volatile: WBIF or CLSE?

Over the past year, WBIF had a volatility of 12.54%, while CLSE experienced 13.42%.

Which ETF is bigger: WBIF or CLSE?

As of July 17, 2026, WBIF holds $23.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $753.14 M.

What sectors do the WBIF and CLSE ETFs invest in?

WBIF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, CLSE focuses on Technology and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the WBIF ETF and CLSE ETF?

WBIF top holdings include Dell Technologies, Inc., Amphenol Corp. and Southern Copper Corp.. CLSE holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Lam Research Corp. and Micron Technology, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: WBIF or CLSE?

WBIF holds 73 securities with 36.1% of its assets in the top 15. CLSE has 688 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.15%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF Comparison Tool

Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?

Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.