Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
VTWOvsFSCCETF Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. VTWO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, FSCC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. VTWO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.51% for FSCC. VTWO is up 0.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$71M in YTD flows. FSCC performs better with 0.54% YTD performance, and +$85M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VTWO and FSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VTWO vs FSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VTWO FSCC | -4.73%-5.46% | -2.16%-2.90% | +0.48%+0.54% | +24.55%+28.16% | +49.09%n/a | +13.38%n/a |
| Flows | VTWO FSCC | +$470M+$15M | +$196M+$96M | +$71M+$85M | +$536M+$143M | +$4.85B- | +$7.21B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VTWO FSCC | +18.44%+17.34% | +23.16%+23.19% | +21.10%n/a | +22.69%n/a |
| Max drawdown | VTWO FSCC | -8.30%-6.47% | -16.46%-16.39% | -27.51%n/a | -31.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | VTWO FSCC | 49d48d | 52d46d | 289dn/a | 1093dn/a |
VTWO | FSCC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $100.03 | $29.58 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $102.22 | $30.18 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VTWO | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VTWO | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $100.03 | $29.58 |
| 1D performance | -2.14% | -1.99% |
| AuM | $13.93 B | $156.42 M |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.51% |
VTWO | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Vanguard | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1636 | 272 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2010 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the VTWO and FSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, VTWO is up 0.48% year-to-date (YTD), while FSCC has returned 0.54%. That puts FSCC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VTWO or FSCC?
Year-to-date, the VTWO ETF saw +$71M in flows, compared to +$85M for FSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: VTWO or FSCC?
Over the past year, VTWO had a volatility of 23.16%, while FSCC experienced 23.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: VTWO or FSCC?
As of March 12, 2026, VTWO holds $13.93 B in assets under management (AUM), while FSCC manages $156.42 M.
What sectors do the VTWO and FSCC ETFs invest in?
VTWO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, FSCC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the VTWO ETF and FSCC ETF?
VTWO top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. FSCC holds in its top three: PRIMORIS SERVICES, MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: VTWO or FSCC?
VTWO holds 1958 securities with 7.4% of its assets in the top 15. FSCC has 276 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.58%.
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
Value ETFs Shine Amid Lower-Than-Expected Inflation
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
