VPLvsFLJPETF Comparison
VS
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) belongs to the DM Blended Cap segment. Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is part of the Japan Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. VPL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.07%, versus 0.09% for FLJP. VPL is up 20.04% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.62B in YTD flows. FLJP performs worse with 19.19% YTD performance, and +$1.17B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VPL and FLJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
VPL vs FLJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VPL FLJP | -5.08%-1.19% | -0.26%+3.41% | +20.04%+19.19% | +25.07%+22.12% | +79.52%+77.58% | +56.53%+59.42% |
| Flows | VPL FLJP | +$337M+$151M | +$406M+$105M | -$1.62B+$1.17B | -$1.30B+$1.36B | -$1.71B+$1.72B | +$188M+$2.63B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VPL FLJP | +22.35%+18.83% | +24.00%+21.64% | +18.99%+21.82% | +17.89%+20.47% |
| Max drawdown | VPL FLJP | -8.41%-5.07% | -13.41%-13.65% | -16.37%-18.71% | -28.42%-29.22% |
| Max drawdown duration | VPL FLJP | 24d10d | 64d110d | 239d235d | 849d817d |
Trading data
VPL | FLJP | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $109.17 | $40.46 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $110.27 | $40.63 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VPL | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
VPL | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $109.17 | $40.46 |
| 1D performance | -1.00% | -0.42% |
| AuM | $8.45 B | $4.21 B |
| E/R | 0.07% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
VPL | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Vanguard | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 2330 | 474 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 4, 2005 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
VPL
Japan
53.13%
Republic of Korea
21.75%
Australia
14.31%
Other
10.8%
FLJP
Japan
100%
Other
-0%
Sectors
VPL
Technology
26.62%
Finance
23.58%
Industrials
13.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.59%
Other
27.26%
FLJP
Technology
22.44%
Finance
20.61%
Industrials
18.76%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.3%
Other
19.92%
Advertisement
Diversification
VPL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.42%
FLJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
VPL
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.68%
SK hynix, Inc.
5.14%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.90%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.83%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.61%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.46%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.19%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.18%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.17%
Advantest Corp.
1.16%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.15%
Sony Group Corp.
1.12%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
0.96%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
0.94%
SoftBank Group Corp.
0.93%
FLJP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.85%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.25%
Advantest Corp.
2.49%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.41%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.41%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.31%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.30%
Sony Group Corp.
2.27%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.93%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.92%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.55%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.51%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.47%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.42%
ITOCHU Corp.
1.33%
Frequently asked questions about VPL and FLJP
How have the VPL and FLJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, VPL is up 20.04% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJP has returned 19.19%. That puts VPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VPL or FLJP?
Year-to-date, the VPL ETF saw -$1.62B in flows, compared to +$1.17B for FLJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: VPL or FLJP?
Over the past year, VPL had a volatility of 24%, while FLJP experienced 21.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: VPL or FLJP?
As of October 16, 2026, VPL holds $8.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLJP manages $4.21 B.
What sectors do the VPL and FLJP ETFs invest in?
VPL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, FLJP focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the VPL ETF and FLJP ETF?
VPL top holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SK hynix, Inc. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. FLJP holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Advantest Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: VPL or FLJP?
VPL holds 2348 securities with 28.42% of its assets in the top 15. FLJP has 474 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.41%.
Advertisement
Latest news about VPL & FLJP
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
July 1, 2024
FLJP
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
April 5, 2024
FLJP
Advertisement
Advertisement
