VPLvsFLJHETF Comparison
VS
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) belongs to the DM Blended Cap segment. Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is part of the Japan Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. VPL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.07%, versus 0.09% for FLJH. VPL is up 20.04% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.62B in YTD flows. FLJH performs better with 23.07% YTD performance, and +$69M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VPL and FLJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
VPL vs FLJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VPL FLJH | -5.08%+0.94% | -0.26%+1.24% | +20.04%+23.07% | +25.07%+31.81% | +79.52%+111.86% | +56.53%+164.44% |
| Flows | VPL FLJH | +$337M-$23M | +$406M+$22M | -$1.62B+$69M | -$1.30B+$69M | -$1.71B-$16M | +$188M+$142M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VPL FLJH | +22.35%+18.29% | +24.00%+20.83% | +18.99%+21.53% | +17.89%+19.44% |
| Max drawdown | VPL FLJH | -8.41%-4.95% | -13.41%-11.13% | -16.37%-25.01% | -28.42%-25.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | VPL FLJH | 24d10d | 64d71d | 239d321d | 849d321d |
Trading data
VPL | FLJH | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $109.17 | $45.41 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $110.27 | $45.64 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VPL | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
VPL | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $109.17 | $45.41 |
| 1D performance | -1.00% | -0.51% |
| AuM | $8.45 B | $206.10 M |
| E/R | 0.07% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
VPL | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Vanguard | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 2330 | 473 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 4, 2005 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
VPL
Japan
53.13%
Republic of Korea
21.75%
Australia
14.31%
Other
10.8%
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
VPL
Technology
26.62%
Finance
23.58%
Industrials
13.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.59%
Other
27.26%
FLJH
Technology
22.75%
Finance
20.47%
Industrials
18.71%
Consumer Cyclical.
10%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.29%
Other
19.78%
Advertisement
Diversification
VPL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.42%
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
VPL
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.68%
SK hynix, Inc.
5.14%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.90%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.83%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.61%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.46%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.19%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.18%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.17%
Advantest Corp.
1.16%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.15%
Sony Group Corp.
1.12%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
0.96%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
0.94%
SoftBank Group Corp.
0.93%
FLJH
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.84%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.25%
Advantest Corp.
2.55%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.41%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.41%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.31%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.28%
Sony Group Corp.
2.26%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.94%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.92%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.65%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.51%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.49%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.41%
ITOCHU Corp.
1.33%
Frequently asked questions about VPL and FLJH
How have the VPL and FLJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, VPL is up 20.04% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJH has returned 23.07%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VPL or FLJH?
Year-to-date, the VPL ETF saw -$1.62B in flows, compared to +$69M for FLJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: VPL or FLJH?
Over the past year, VPL had a volatility of 24%, while FLJH experienced 20.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: VPL or FLJH?
As of October 16, 2026, VPL holds $8.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLJH manages $206.10 M.
What sectors do the VPL and FLJH ETFs invest in?
VPL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, FLJH focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the VPL ETF and FLJH ETF?
VPL top holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SK hynix, Inc. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. FLJH holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Advantest Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: VPL or FLJH?
VPL holds 2348 securities with 28.42% of its assets in the top 15. FLJH has 473 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.56%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
