Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
VOTEvsONOFETF Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF
TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is part of the segment. VOTE's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, ONOF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. VOTE is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.05%, versus 0.39% for ONOF. VOTE is down -0.89% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. ONOF performs worse with -1.03% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VOTE and ONOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VOTE vs ONOF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VOTE ONOF | -2.17%-2.19% | -1.51%-1.88% | -0.89%-1.03% | +22.37%+13.72% | +84.62%+46.26% | n/a+54.21% |
| Flows | VOTE ONOF | +$39M+$3M | +$43M+$4M | +$48M+$2M | +$100M+$5M | +$207M+$39M | -+$52M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VOTE ONOF | +11.67%+11.78% | +18.40%+17.22% | +15.14%+14.17% | n/a+14.45% |
| Max drawdown | VOTE ONOF | -3.45%-3.48% | -13.92%-13.77% | -19.12%-21.66% | n/a-25.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | VOTE ONOF | 42d58d | 45d89d | 126d205d | n/a756d |
VOTE | ONOF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.60 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $37.19 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VOTE | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VOTE | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $36.60 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.60% |
| AuM | $972.34 M | $142.50 M |
| E/R | 0.05% | 0.39% |
VOTE | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | TCW | Global X |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Large Cap Select Index | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index |
| N° of holdings | 469 | 470 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 22, 2021 | January 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the VOTE and ONOF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, VOTE is down -0.89% year-to-date (YTD), while ONOF has lost -1.03%. That puts VOTE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VOTE or ONOF?
Year-to-date, the VOTE ETF saw +$48M in flows, compared to +$2M for ONOF.
Which ETF is more volatile: VOTE or ONOF?
Over the past year, VOTE had a volatility of 18.4%, while ONOF experienced 17.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: VOTE or ONOF?
As of March 10, 2026, VOTE holds $972.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONOF manages $142.50 M.
What sectors do the VOTE and ONOF ETFs invest in?
VOTE leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, ONOF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the VOTE ETF and ONOF ETF?
VOTE top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ONOF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: VOTE or ONOF?
VOTE holds 490 securities with 43.47% of its assets in the top 15. ONOF has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.08%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
