VOTEvsCATHETF Comparison
TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. VOTE is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.05%, versus 0.29% for CATH. VOTE is up 7.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$69M in YTD flows. CATH performs worse with 7.44% YTD performance, and +$97M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VOTE and CATH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VOTE vs CATH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VOTE CATH | -1.76%+0.21% | +2.95%+3.02% | +7.64%+7.44% | +16.02%+14.39% | +66.99%+61.51% | +74.79%+70.02% |
| Flows | VOTE CATH | +$5M+$46M | +$16M+$40M | +$69M+$97M | +$96M+$137M | +$177M+$142M | +$524M+$256M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VOTE CATH | +13.49%+12.73% | +12.99%+12.91% | +15.28%+15.32% | +17.44%+17.61% |
| Max drawdown | VOTE CATH | -4.58%-4.47% | -9.04%-9.42% | -19.12%-19.35% | -25.66%-26.22% |
| Max drawdown duration | VOTE CATH | 57d56d | 76d92d | 126d126d | 715d713d |
VOTE | CATH | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 7:22 PM | $88.26 | |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $86.81 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VOTE | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VOTE | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $88.26 |
| 1D performance | – | +1.67% |
| AuM | $1.07 B | $1.28 B |
| E/R | 0.05% | 0.29% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
