Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
VOOGvsNBGXETF Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. VOOG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.07%, versus 2.83% for NBGX. VOOG is down -2.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$522M in YTD flows. NBGX performs worse with -4.22% YTD performance, and +$683K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VOOG and NBGX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VOOG vs NBGX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VOOG NBGX | -1.63%-1.40% | -3.64%-4.97% | -2.72%-4.22% | +29.71%+20.29% | +106.45%n/a | +96.71%n/a |
| Flows | VOOG NBGX | +$104M- | +$766M+$1M | +$522M+$683K | +$3.06B+$2M | +$7.14B- | +$9.45B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VOOG NBGX | +15.97%+13.71% | +22.24%+20.61% | +18.51%n/a | +21.03%n/a |
| Max drawdown | VOOG NBGX | -6.08%-6.49% | -15.10%-14.35% | -22.22%n/a | -32.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | VOOG NBGX | 41d56d | 45d37d | 124dn/a | 794dn/a |
VOOG | NBGX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $432.74 | $26.73 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $432.35 | $26.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VOOG | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VOOG | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $432.74 | $26.73 |
| 1D performance | +0.09% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $21.89 B | $13.41 M |
| E/R | 0.07% | 2.83% |
VOOG | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Vanguard | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 132 | 44 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 7, 2010 | December 18, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the VOOG and NBGX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, VOOG is down -2.72% year-to-date (YTD), while NBGX has lost -4.22%. That puts VOOG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VOOG or NBGX?
Year-to-date, the VOOG ETF saw +$522M in flows, compared to +$683K for NBGX.
Which ETF is more volatile: VOOG or NBGX?
Over the past year, VOOG had a volatility of 22.24%, while NBGX experienced 20.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: VOOG or NBGX?
As of March 10, 2026, VOOG holds $21.89 B in assets under management (AUM), while NBGX manages $13.41 M.
What sectors do the VOOG and NBGX ETFs invest in?
VOOG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NBGX focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the VOOG ETF and NBGX ETF?
VOOG top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. NBGX holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: VOOG or NBGX?
VOOG holds 139 securities with 69.28% of its assets in the top 15. NBGX has 45 securities and a top 15 weight of 69.76%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
