Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
VONVvsCSTKETF Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. VONV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, CSTK's top sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Information Technology. VONV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.35% for CSTK. VONV is up 3.5% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.47B in YTD flows. CSTK performs worse with 1.43% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VONV and CSTK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VONV vs CSTK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VONV CSTK | -3.21%-5.48% | +2.76%+0.81% | +3.50%+1.43% | +20.07%n/a | +57.97%n/a | +59.67%n/a |
| Flows | VONV CSTK | +$1.40B+$6M | +$1.61B+$1M | +$1.47B+$6M | +$3.54B- | +$6.05B- | +$8.82B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VONV CSTK | +10.68%+11.28% | +15.63%n/a | +13.06%n/a | +14.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown | VONV CSTK | -3.52%-5.48% | -12.06%n/a | -15.61%n/a | -19.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | VONV CSTK | 10d28d | 52dn/a | 213dn/a | 700dn/a |
VONV | CSTK | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $94.20 | $29.14 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $95.51 | $29.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VONV | CSTK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VONV | CSTK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $94.20 | $29.14 |
| 1D performance | -1.38% | -1.26% |
| AuM | $16.45 B | $117.13 M |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the VONV and CSTK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, VONV is up 3.5% year-to-date (YTD), while CSTK has returned 1.43%. That puts VONV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VONV or CSTK?
Year-to-date, the VONV ETF saw +$1.47B in flows, compared to +$6M for CSTK.
Which ETF is bigger: VONV or CSTK?
As of March 11, 2026, VONV holds $16.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while CSTK manages $117.13 M.
What sectors do the VONV and CSTK ETFs invest in?
VONV leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, CSTK focuses on Financials, Health Care and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the VONV ETF and CSTK ETF?
VONV top holdings include BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and ALPHABET INC-CL. CSTK holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, BK OF AMERICA CO and WELLS FARGO.
Which ETF is more diversified: VONV or CSTK?
VONV holds 869 securities with 24.03% of its assets in the top 15. CSTK has 52 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.68%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
