Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
VONGvsGSGOETF Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. VONG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, GSGO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. VONG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.45% for GSGO. VONG is down -4.57% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4.65B in YTD flows. GSGO performs better with -3.97% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VONG and GSGO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VONG vs GSGO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VONG GSGO | -1.72%-2.12% | -5.72%-5.05% | -4.57%-3.97% | +24.66%n/a | +105.44%n/a | +97.15%n/a |
| Flows | VONG GSGO | +$2.12B-$3M | +$5.19B-$8M | +$4.65B-$5M | +$9.68B- | +$15.64B- | +$20.88B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VONG GSGO | +15.26%+16.72% | +22.51%n/a | +18.93%n/a | +21.47%n/a |
| Max drawdown | VONG GSGO | -7.13%-6.94% | -15.76%n/a | -23.34%n/a | -32.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | VONG GSGO | 75d71d | 45dn/a | 191dn/a | 729dn/a |
VONG | GSGO | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.17 | $38.50 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $116.19 | $38.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VONG | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VONG | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.17 | $38.50 |
| 1D performance | -0.02% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $38.97 B | $146.32 M |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.45% |
VONG | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Vanguard | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 349 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2010 | November 14, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the VONG and GSGO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, VONG is down -4.57% year-to-date (YTD), while GSGO has lost -3.97%. That puts GSGO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VONG or GSGO?
Year-to-date, the VONG ETF saw +$4.65B in flows, compared to -$5M for GSGO.
Which ETF is bigger: VONG or GSGO?
As of March 10, 2026, VONG holds $38.97 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSGO manages $146.32 M.
What sectors do the VONG and GSGO ETFs invest in?
VONG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, GSGO focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the VONG ETF and GSGO ETF?
VONG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GSGO holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: VONG or GSGO?
VONG holds 391 securities with 66.34% of its assets in the top 15. GSGO has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.84%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
