VOvsMCDSETF Comparison
VS
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. VO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.35% for MCDS. VO is up 12.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4.41B in YTD flows. MCDS performs better with 16% YTD performance, and -$4K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VO and MCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
VO vs MCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VO MCDS | +0.63%-0.15% | +6.16%+6.53% | +12.46%+16.00% | +13.97%+18.80% | +50.61%n/a | +46.63%n/a |
| Flows | VO MCDS | -$730M- | +$1.61B-$4K | +$4.41B-$4K | +$7.77B+$14K | +$21.27B- | +$29.97B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VO MCDS | +11.83%+12.60% | +12.61%+13.30% | +14.73%n/a | +17.56%n/a |
| Max drawdown | VO MCDS | -3.19%-3.13% | -8.12%-7.49% | -18.93%n/a | -27.54%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | VO MCDS | 8d16d | 49d46d | 211dn/a | 972dn/a |
Trading data
VO | MCDS | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.35 | $67.97 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $81.01 | $67.63 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexVO | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
VO | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.35 | $67.97 |
| 1D performance | +0.42% | +0.49% |
| AuM | $105.98 B | $8.12 M |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
VO | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Vanguard | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | CRSP U.S. Mid Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 278 | 185 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 26, 2004 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
VO
USA
95.94%
Other
4.06%
MCDS
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
Sectors
VO
Finance
19.55%
Industrials
18.03%
Technology
17.76%
Utilities
8.34%
Healthcare
7.78%
Energy
7.17%
Other
21.38%
MCDS
Finance
20.78%
Industrials
18.07%
Technology
17.55%
Healthcare
8.96%
Other
34.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
VO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.22%
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.19%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
VO
Vertiv Holdings Co.
1.22%
Western Digital Corp.
1.06%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.04%
Quanta Services, Inc.
1.04%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
1.04%
Cummins, Inc.
0.95%
Datadog, Inc.
0.83%
Bloom Energy Corp.
0.79%
Constellation Energy Corp.
0.78%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.76%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.76%
Valero Energy Corp.
0.75%
Coherent Corp.
0.74%
Royal Caribbean Group
0.74%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.73%
MCDS
Western Digital Corp.
2.94%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
1.62%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.60%
Quanta Services, Inc.
1.35%
State Street Corp.
1.29%
Sandisk Corp.
1.26%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
1.24%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.18%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.15%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.13%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.13%
Dover Corp.
1.12%
Ross Stores, Inc.
1.08%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.06%
Corning, Inc.
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about VO and MCDS
How have the VO and MCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, VO is up 12.46% year-to-date (YTD), while MCDS has returned 16%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VO or MCDS?
Year-to-date, the VO ETF saw +$4.41B in flows, compared to -$4K for MCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: VO or MCDS?
Over the past year, VO had a volatility of 12.61%, while MCDS experienced 13.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: VO or MCDS?
As of July 27, 2026, VO holds $105.98 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCDS manages $8.12 M.
What sectors do the VO and MCDS ETFs invest in?
VO leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, MCDS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the VO ETF and MCDS ETF?
VO top holdings include Vertiv Holdings Co., Western Digital Corp. and Seagate Technology Holdings Plc. MCDS holds in its top three: Western Digital Corp., Howmet Aerospace, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VO or MCDS?
VO holds 282 securities with 13.22% of its assets in the top 15. MCDS has 185 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.19%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
