VOvsMCDSETF Comparison
VS
Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. VO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.35% for MCDS. VO is up 13.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5.06B in YTD flows. MCDS performs better with 15.23% YTD performance, and +$38K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VO and MCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
VO vs MCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VO MCDS | +2.86%+2.24% | +0.68%-0.67% | +13.22%+15.23% | +11.32%+15.77% | +72.40%n/a | +39.18%n/a |
| Flows | VO MCDS | +$21M-$1M | +$648M+$43K | +$5.06B+$38K | +$6.95B+$56K | +$21.30B- | +$28.86B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VO MCDS | +10.68%+10.75% | +12.50%+12.96% | +14.56%n/a | +17.53%n/a |
| Max drawdown | VO MCDS | -6.83%-7.51% | -8.12%-7.51% | -18.93%n/a | -27.54%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | VO MCDS | 71d71d | 49d71d | 211dn/a | 972dn/a |
Trading data
VO | MCDS | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.45 | $67.18 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $81.26 | $66.97 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexVO | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
VO | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.45 | $67.18 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | +0.31% |
| AuM | $107.03 B | $8.04 M |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
VO | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Vanguard | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | CRSP U.S. Mid Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 277 | 203 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 26, 2004 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
VO
USA
95.4%
Other
4.6%
MCDS
USA
96.78%
Other
3.22%
Sectors
VO
Finance
20.58%
Technology
16.83%
Industrials
16.07%
Energy
8.72%
Healthcare
8.54%
Utilities
7.66%
Other
21.61%
MCDS
Finance
21.45%
Technology
17.37%
Industrials
15.57%
Healthcare
11.44%
Other
34.17%
Advertisement
Diversification
VO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.12%
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.46%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
VO
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.04%
Valero Energy Corp.
1.01%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.95%
Phillips 66
0.94%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
0.93%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.93%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
0.88%
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.87%
SLB Ltd.
0.86%
Constellation Energy Corp.
0.85%
DoorDash, Inc.
0.82%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.79%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
0.77%
Datadog, Inc.
0.75%
Cummins, Inc.
0.74%
MCDS
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.59%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.29%
State Street Corp.
1.25%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.19%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.16%
Natera, Inc.
1.12%
Snowflake, Inc.
1.08%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.07%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.05%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
0.98%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.98%
Dover Corp.
0.96%
TechnipFMC plc
0.92%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
0.91%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.91%
Frequently asked questions about VO and MCDS
How have the VO and MCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, VO is up 13.22% year-to-date (YTD), while MCDS has returned 15.23%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VO or MCDS?
Year-to-date, the VO ETF saw +$5.06B in flows, compared to +$38K for MCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: VO or MCDS?
Over the past year, VO had a volatility of 12.5%, while MCDS experienced 12.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: VO or MCDS?
As of October 26, 2026, VO holds $107.03 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCDS manages $8.04 M.
What sectors do the VO and MCDS ETFs invest in?
VO leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, MCDS focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the VO ETF and MCDS ETF?
VO top holdings include Marathon Petroleum Corp., Valero Energy Corp. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. MCDS holds in its top three: Marathon Petroleum Corp., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and State Street Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: VO or MCDS?
VO holds 280 securities with 13.12% of its assets in the top 15. MCDS has 203 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.46%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
