VFMVvsFNDBETF Comparison
VS
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. VFMV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.13%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. VFMV is up 6.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$61M in YTD flows. FNDB performs better with 9.25% YTD performance, and +$81M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VFMV and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
VFMV vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VFMV FNDB | +5.92%+8.16% | +3.95%+4.98% | +6.98%+9.25% | +16.16%+32.60% | +48.35%+68.63% | +59.24%+78.66% |
| Flows | VFMV FNDB | +$13M+$18M | +$60M+$64M | +$61M+$81M | +$125M+$103M | +$266M+$345M | +$301M+$477M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VFMV FNDB | +10.04%+12.15% | +9.09%+11.37% | +10.44%+13.66% | +12.01%+15.65% |
| Max drawdown | VFMV FNDB | -5.98%-6.34% | -5.98%-6.34% | -10.46%-16.85% | -15.42%-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | VFMV FNDB | 56d63d | 56d63d | 100d213d | 701d546d |
Trading data
VFMV | FNDB | |
Last sale 4/27/2026 at 7:59 PM | $139.02 | $28.89 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $139.40 | $28.92 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VFMV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexVFMV | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/27/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
VFMV | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $139.02 | $28.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $411.96 M | $1.22 B |
| E/R | 0.13% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
VFMV | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Vanguard | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 166 | 1293 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 13, 2018 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
VFMV
USA
88.63%
Other
11.37%
FNDB
USA
96.57%
Other
3.43%
Sectors
VFMV
Information Techn.
23.59%
Financials
10.19%
Health Care
9.53%
Communication Ser.
9.17%
Consumer Staples
8.86%
Industrials
8.56%
Other
30.1%
FNDB
Information Techn.
16.87%
Financials
13.17%
Health Care
11.68%
Energy
11.55%
Communication Ser.
9.85%
Consumer Discreti.
9.37%
Other
27.51%
Advertisement
Diversification
VFMV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.26%
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.91%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
VFMV
CIRRUS LOGIC
1.50%
ROSS STORES
1.46%
TJX
1.44%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.42%
DOLBY LABORATORIES
1.42%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.42%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
1.42%
NVIDIA
1.41%
COCA-COLA
1.41%
ANALOG DEVICES
1.41%
MICROSOFT-T
1.40%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
1.40%
APPLE
1.40%
LOEWS
1.38%
ENSIGN GROUP
1.38%
FNDB
APPLE
4.16%
EXXON
2.88%
MICROSOFT-T
2.09%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.94%
CHEVRON TEXACO
1.87%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.57%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.56%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.55%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.48%
WALMART INC
1.18%
META PLATFORMS
1.18%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.16%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.12%
INTEL-T
1.09%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
1.07%
Frequently asked questions about VFMV and FNDB
How have the VFMV and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, VFMV is up 6.98% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 9.25%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VFMV or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the VFMV ETF saw +$61M in flows, compared to +$81M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: VFMV or FNDB?
Over the past year, VFMV had a volatility of 9.09%, while FNDB experienced 11.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: VFMV or FNDB?
As of April 27, 2026, VFMV holds $411.96 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.22 B.
What sectors do the VFMV and FNDB ETFs invest in?
VFMV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the VFMV ETF and FNDB ETF?
VFMV top holdings include CIRRUS LOGIC, ROSS STORES and TJX. FNDB holds in its top three: APPLE, EXXON and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: VFMV or FNDB?
VFMV holds 168 securities with 21.26% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1383 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.91%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
