VCRMvsBSMUETF Comparison
VS
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. VCRM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.18% for BSMU. VCRM is down -0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.18B in YTD flows. BSMU performs worse with -1.37% YTD performance, and +$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VCRM and BSMU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
VCRM vs BSMU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VCRM BSMU | -2.07%-1.75% | -3.14%-2.24% | -0.95%-1.37% | +0.50%-0.68% | n/a+8.37% | n/a-5.46% |
| Flows | VCRM BSMU | +$134M+$6M | +$300M+$30M | +$1.18B+$63M | +$1.49B+$112M | -+$234M | -+$283M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VCRM BSMU | +3.20%+2.22% | +2.57%+1.76% | n/a+3.34% | n/a+4.11% |
| Max drawdown | VCRM BSMU | -3.57%-2.43% | -3.57%-3.05% | n/a-4.33% | n/a-18.36% |
| Max drawdown duration | VCRM BSMU | 74d74d | 74d201d | n/a261d | n/a1719d |
Trading data
VCRM | BSMU | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.07 | $21.25 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $73.27 | $21.28 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VCRM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexVCRM | BSMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
VCRM | BSMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.07 | $21.25 |
| 1D performance | -0.27% | -0.15% |
| AuM | $1.93 B | $280.61 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.18% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
VCRM
USA
58.45%
Other
41.55%
BSMU
USA
61.65%
Other
38.35%
Sectors
VCRM
Municipal
58.45%
Other
41.55%
BSMU
Municipal
61.65%
Other
38.35%
Diversification
VCRM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.97%
BSMU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.19%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
VCRM
University of Cincinnati, 5% 1jun2045, USD (2017)
0.83%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025)
0.74%
Massachusetts, 5% 1jun2047, USD
0.66%
US09182TEC71
0.63%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022)
0.55%
Chicago O'Hare International Airport, 5% 1jan2047, USD (2016D)
0.55%
Jefferson Sales Tax District, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2017B)
0.54%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026)
0.47%
PEFA Inc., 5% 1apr2035, USD (2026A)
0.46%
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, 6% 1jan2057, USD (2026B)
0.45%
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, 5.75% 1jul2062, USD (2023-1, A)
0.43%
Energy Southeast, 5% 1sep2033, USD (2025B)
0.43%
Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, 5% 1jul2043, USD
0.42%
US57563WAC29
0.42%
Grand Parkway Transportation Corp., 5% 1oct2043, USD (2018A)
0.40%
BSMU
Los Angeles Unified School District, 4% 1jul2044, USD
0.63%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 4.75% 15nov2045, USD (2020C)
0.59%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5.25% 15nov2055, USD (2020C)
0.56%
California, 4% 1mar2036, USD
0.53%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15nov2049, USD (2020A)
0.43%
California, 5% 1mar2035, USD
0.40%
US544532QE75
0.40%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2050, USD (2020C)
0.39%
New York Urban Development Corp., 5% 15mar2047, USD (2020C)
0.38%
US89602HFT95
0.35%
California, 5% 1nov2030, USD
0.33%
City of New York, 5% 1aug2030, USD
0.31%
US91412HWB58
0.31%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2045, USD
0.30%
Miracosta Community College District, 4% 1aug2045, USD
0.30%
Frequently asked questions about VCRM and BSMU
How have the VCRM and BSMU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, VCRM is down -0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while BSMU has lost -1.37%. That puts VCRM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VCRM or BSMU?
Year-to-date, the VCRM ETF saw +$1.18B in flows, compared to +$63M for BSMU.
Which ETF is more volatile: VCRM or BSMU?
Over the past year, VCRM had a volatility of 2.57%, while BSMU experienced 1.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: VCRM or BSMU?
As of September 18, 2026, VCRM holds $1.93 B in assets under management (AUM), while BSMU manages $280.61 M.
What sectors do the VCRM and BSMU ETFs invest in?
VCRM leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, BSMU focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the VCRM ETF and BSMU ETF?
VCRM top holdings include University of Cincinnati, 5% 1jun2045, USD (2017), Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025) and Massachusetts, 5% 1jun2047, USD. BSMU holds in its top three: Los Angeles Unified School District, 4% 1jul2044, USD, New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 4.75% 15nov2045, USD (2020C) and New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5.25% 15nov2055, USD (2020C).
Which ETF is more diversified: VCRM or BSMU?
VCRM holds 2396 securities with 7.97% of its assets in the top 15. BSMU has 1752 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.19%.
Advertisement
