Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
UTESvsZAPETF Comparison
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) belongs to the US Utilities segment. Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) is part of the Infrastructure segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Utilities. UTES is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.5% for ZAP. UTES is up 1.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$60M in YTD flows. ZAP performs better with 12.25% YTD performance, and +$80M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UTES and ZAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
UTES vs ZAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UTES ZAP | +1.30%-0.43% | +0.46%+11.31% | +1.98%+12.25% | +30.65%+37.88% | +92.36%n/a | +124.67%n/a |
| Flows | UTES ZAP | +$33M+$32M | -$28M+$88M | -$60M+$80M | +$913M+$256M | +$1.23B- | +$1.24B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UTES ZAP | +23.67%+14.09% | +22.25%+15.93% | +21.05%n/a | +20.13%n/a |
| Max drawdown | UTES ZAP | -8.65%-3.08% | -13.76%-8.69% | -17.24%n/a | -20.55%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | UTES ZAP | 28d16d | 147d26d | 109dn/a | 590dn/a |
UTES | ZAP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.63 | $32.60 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $80.86 | $32.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
UTES | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
UTES | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.63 | $32.60 |
| 1D performance | +0.95% | +0.57% |
| AuM | $1.39 B | $360.86 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.5% |
UTES | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VIRTUS Investment Partners | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Global X U.S. Electrification Index |
| N° of holdings | 18 | 47 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 7, 2019 | December 18, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the UTES and ZAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, UTES is up 1.98% year-to-date (YTD), while ZAP has returned 12.25%. That puts ZAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UTES or ZAP?
Year-to-date, the UTES ETF saw -$60M in flows, compared to +$80M for ZAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: UTES or ZAP?
Over the past year, UTES had a volatility of 22.25%, while ZAP experienced 15.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: UTES or ZAP?
As of March 11, 2026, UTES holds $1.39 B in assets under management (AUM), while ZAP manages $360.86 M.
What sectors do the UTES and ZAP ETFs invest in?
UTES leans toward sectors like Utilities. Meanwhile, ZAP focuses on Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the UTES ETF and ZAP ETF?
UTES top holdings include US87422Q1094, VISTRA CORP and CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP. ZAP holds in its top three: AMETEK, QUANTA SERVICES and US6362744095.
Which ETF is more diversified: UTES or ZAP?
UTES holds 18 securities with 94.89% of its assets in the top 15. ZAP has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.14%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
