Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
USSGvsCATHETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF (USSG) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. USSG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, CATH's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. USSG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.29% for CATH. USSG is down -3.93% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. CATH performs better with -3.47% YTD performance, and +$38M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USSG and CATH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USSG vs CATH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USSG CATH | -3.77%-3.05% | -3.39%-3.06% | -3.93%-3.47% | +23.48%+21.07% | +81.28%+74.04% | +79.85%+70.65% |
| Flows | USSG CATH | -$6M+$25M | +$37M+$37M | -$6M+$38M | -$96M+$99M | -$3.21B+$85M | -$3.49B+$212M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USSG CATH | +12.72%+12.14% | +18.31%+18.57% | +15.52%+15.13% | +17.34%+17.50% |
| Max drawdown | USSG CATH | -6.57%-5.28% | -13.43%-13.72% | -20.08%-19.35% | -26.89%-26.22% |
| Max drawdown duration | USSG CATH | 44d60d | 45d45d | 154d126d | 713d713d |
USSG | CATH | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.01 | $79.38 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $61.44 | $79.87 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
USSG | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
USSG | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.01 | $79.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.71% | -0.62% |
| AuM | $520.27 M | $1.10 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.29% |
USSG | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Global X |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Selection Index | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index |
| N° of holdings | 380 | 426 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 7, 2019 | April 18, 2016 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the USSG and CATH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, USSG is down -3.93% year-to-date (YTD), while CATH has lost -3.47%. That puts CATH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USSG or CATH?
Year-to-date, the USSG ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to +$38M for CATH.
Which ETF is more volatile: USSG or CATH?
Over the past year, USSG had a volatility of 18.31%, while CATH experienced 18.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: USSG or CATH?
As of March 13, 2026, USSG holds $520.27 M in assets under management (AUM), while CATH manages $1.10 B.
What sectors do the USSG and CATH ETFs invest in?
USSG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, CATH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the USSG ETF and CATH ETF?
USSG top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. CATH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: USSG or CATH?
USSG holds 399 securities with 53.39% of its assets in the top 15. CATH has 444 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.74%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
