Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
USNZvsSGLCETF Comparison
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. USNZ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. In contrast, SGLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. USNZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.85% for SGLC. USNZ is down -2.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. SGLC performs better with -0.89% YTD performance, and +$45M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNZ and SGLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USNZ vs SGLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNZ SGLC | -2.59%-2.11% | -3.29%+0.51% | -2.52%-0.89% | +20.25%+22.49% | +75.60%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | USNZ SGLC | -$5M+$35M | -$5M+$46M | -$5M+$45M | -$2M+$50M | +$95M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNZ SGLC | +12.22%+13.61% | +18.21%+18.86% | +14.92%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | USNZ SGLC | -4.64%-5.12% | -13.93%-14.14% | -19.00%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | USNZ SGLC | 42d42d | 46d45d | 126dn/a | n/an/a |
USNZ | SGLC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.42 | $37.71 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $42.13 | $38.04 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
USNZ | SGLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
USNZ | SGLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.42 | $37.71 |
| 1D performance | -1.68% | -0.87% |
| AuM | $269.75 M | $154.46 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.85% |
USNZ | SGLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Summit Global Investments |
| Benchmark | Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 448 | 115 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2022 | March 31, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the USNZ and SGLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, USNZ is down -2.52% year-to-date (YTD), while SGLC has lost -0.89%. That puts SGLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNZ or SGLC?
Year-to-date, the USNZ ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to +$45M for SGLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: USNZ or SGLC?
Over the past year, USNZ had a volatility of 18.21%, while SGLC experienced 18.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: USNZ or SGLC?
As of March 11, 2026, USNZ holds $269.75 M in assets under management (AUM), while SGLC manages $154.46 M.
What sectors do the USNZ and SGLC ETFs invest in?
USNZ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, SGLC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the USNZ ETF and SGLC ETF?
USNZ top holdings include APPLE, NVIDIA and MICROSOFT-T. SGLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: USNZ or SGLC?
USNZ holds 477 securities with 48.57% of its assets in the top 15. SGLC has 116 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
