USNZvsRWLCETF Comparison
ETF 1
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
VS
ETF 2
RWLC
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Uncategorized Equities
-0%
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) belongs to the segment. Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RWLC) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. USNZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.32% for RWLC. USNZ is up 12.59% year-to-date (YTD) with -$17M in YTD flows. RWLC performs better with 15.32% YTD performance, and -$30M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNZ and RWLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
USNZ vs RWLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNZ RWLC | -0.55%-0.96% | +4.16%+6.76% | +12.59%+15.32% | +17.48%+17.91% | +74.53%+85.67% | n/an/a |
| Flows | USNZ RWLC | -+$5M | -$159K+$583K | -$17M-$30M | -$16M-$27M | +$33M-$14M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNZ RWLC | +13.24%+10.94% | +14.09%+12.40% | +15.42%+13.23% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | USNZ RWLC | -3.74%-2.28% | -11.08%-8.74% | -19.00%-15.40% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | USNZ RWLC | 16d7d | 76d75d | 126d85d | n/an/a |
Trading data
USNZ | RWLC | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.50 | $38.61 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $48.06 | $38.26 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RWLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUSNZ | RWLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
USNZ | RWLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.50 | $38.61 |
| 1D performance | +0.90% | +0.91% |
| AuM | $298.02 M | $74.13 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
USNZ | RWLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 500 | 98 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2022 | December 15, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Exposure
Countries
USNZ
USA
97.23%
Other
2.77%
RWLC
USA
97.24%
Other
2.76%
Sectors
USNZ
Technology
52.42%
Finance
14.21%
Healthcare
11.89%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.69%
Other
13.78%
RWLC
Technology
48.21%
Finance
13.47%
Healthcare
12.39%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.87%
Other
18.06%
Advertisement
Diversification
USNZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.15%
RWLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
USNZ
Apple, Inc.
9.73%
NVIDIA Corp.
9.23%
Microsoft Corp.
5.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.63%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Broadcom Inc.
2.94%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.29%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.75%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.66%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.57%
Tesla, Inc.
1.49%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.34%
Johnson & Johnson
1.14%
Visa, Inc.
1.01%
RWLC
Apple, Inc.
8.63%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.16%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.44%
Microsoft Corp.
2.78%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.66%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.56%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.49%
Lam Research Corp.
2.09%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.04%
Adobe, Inc.
1.88%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.88%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
1.83%
McKesson Corp.
1.70%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.68%
Frequently asked questions about USNZ and RWLC
How have the USNZ and RWLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, USNZ is up 12.59% year-to-date (YTD), while RWLC has returned 15.32%. That puts RWLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNZ or RWLC?
Year-to-date, the USNZ ETF saw -$17M in flows, compared to -$30M for RWLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: USNZ or RWLC?
Over the past year, USNZ had a volatility of 14.09%, while RWLC experienced 12.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: USNZ or RWLC?
As of September 11, 2026, USNZ holds $298.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while RWLC manages $74.13 M.
What sectors do the USNZ and RWLC ETFs invest in?
USNZ leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, RWLC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the USNZ ETF and RWLC ETF?
USNZ top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. RWLC holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: USNZ or RWLC?
USNZ holds 504 securities with 50.15% of its assets in the top 15. RWLC has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.66%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
