USNGvsPAVEETF Comparison
ETF 1
USNG
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
This fund is part of
Infrastructure
-0.12%
VS
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. USNG's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, PAVE's top sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Utilities. USNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.47% for PAVE. USNG is up 28.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. PAVE performs worse with 18.08% YTD performance, and +$2.11B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNG and PAVE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
USNG vs PAVE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNG PAVE | -2.14%-2.70% | +4.12%+2.46% | +28.90%+18.08% | +39.53%+25.11% | n/a+80.44% | n/a+136.72% |
| Flows | USNG PAVE | -$733K+$312M | +$384K+$1.03B | +$1M+$2.11B | +$2M+$2.63B | -+$4.28B | -+$4.56B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNG PAVE | +19.51%+22.48% | +16.90%+20.11% | n/a+20.72% | n/a+22.04% |
| Max drawdown | USNG PAVE | -6.56%-7.81% | -6.86%-11.91% | n/a-26.27% | n/a-26.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | USNG PAVE | 53d40d | 41d59d | n/a239d | n/a239d |
Trading data
USNG | PAVE | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.14 | $56.30 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $35.17 | $56.78 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
USNG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUSNG | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
USNG | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.14 | $56.30 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | -0.85% |
| AuM | $7.03 M | $13.91 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.47% |
Characteristics
USNG | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 100 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 20, 2025 | March 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
USNG
USA
83.39%
Canada
10.97%
Other
5.64%
PAVE
USA
92.56%
Other
7.44%
Sectors
USNG
Energy
78.47%
Industrials
13.57%
Other
7.96%
PAVE
Industrials
67.23%
Non-Energy Materi.
28.04%
Other
4.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
USNG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
80.83%
PAVE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
USNG
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
10.31%
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.19%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
8.23%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
7.07%
Enbridge, Inc.
6.82%
MPLX LP
6.54%
TC Energy Corp.
4.15%
DT Midstream, Inc.
4.02%
Plains GP Holdings LP
4.00%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
3.76%
Archrock, Inc.
3.64%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.55%
Energy Transfer LP
3.51%
Western Midstream Partners LP
3.08%
Vistra Corp.
2.96%
PAVE
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.18%
CSX Corp.
3.48%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.30%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
3.27%
Trane Technologies Plc
3.19%
Union Pacific Corp.
3.12%
Nucor Corp.
3.10%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
2.92%
Norfolk Southern Corp.
2.90%
United Rentals, Inc.
2.87%
Deere & Co.
2.86%
Sempra
2.86%
Fastenal Co.
2.71%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.64%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
2.48%
Frequently asked questions about USNG and PAVE
How have the USNG and PAVE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, USNG is up 28.9% year-to-date (YTD), while PAVE has returned 18.08%. That puts USNG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNG or PAVE?
Year-to-date, the USNG ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$2.11B for PAVE.
Which ETF is more volatile: USNG or PAVE?
Over the past year, USNG had a volatility of 16.9%, while PAVE experienced 20.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: USNG or PAVE?
As of July 17, 2026, USNG holds $7.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAVE manages $13.91 B.
What sectors do the USNG and PAVE ETFs invest in?
USNG leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, PAVE focuses on Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the USNG ETF and PAVE ETF?
USNG top holdings include Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc., Bloom Energy Corp. and The Williams Cos., Inc.. PAVE holds in its top three: Quanta Services, Inc., CSX Corp. and Eaton Corp. Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: USNG or PAVE?
USNG holds 26 securities with 80.83% of its assets in the top 15. PAVE has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.86%.
Advertisement
Latest news about USNG & PAVE
Notable ETF Filings Recap: March 2024
April 3, 2024
PAVE
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
December 14, 2023
PAVE
How US Infrastructure Can Benefit Your Portfolio
April 3, 2023
PAVE
Advertisement
Advertisement
