Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
USNGvsNFRAETF Comparison
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund ETF
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund ETF (NFRA) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. USNG's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, NFRA's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Communication Services. USNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.48% for NFRA. USNG is up 20.57% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. NFRA performs worse with 7.41% YTD performance, and -$73M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNG and NFRA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USNG vs NFRA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNG NFRA | +4.65%-1.37% | +17.62%+8.25% | +20.57%+7.41% | n/a+21.46% | n/a+45.18% | n/a+38.14% |
| Flows | USNG NFRA | -- | --$55M | --$73M | -+$286M | -+$142M | -+$298M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNG NFRA | +16.88%+9.27% | n/a+10.45% | n/a+10.02% | n/a+11.23% |
| Max drawdown | USNG NFRA | -4.81%-3.76% | n/a-7.51% | n/a-11.25% | n/a-22.76% |
| Max drawdown duration | USNG NFRA | 28d10d | n/a18d | n/a139d | n/a1042d |
USNG | NFRA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:46 PM | $33.08 | $64.62 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $33.08 | $64.83 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
USNG | NFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
USNG | NFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.08 | $64.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.00% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $5.63 M | $3.04 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.48% |
USNG | NFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | - | STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 155 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 20, 2025 | October 8, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the USNG and NFRA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, USNG is up 20.57% year-to-date (YTD), while NFRA has returned 7.41%. That puts USNG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNG or NFRA?
Year-to-date, the USNG ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$73M for NFRA.
Which ETF is bigger: USNG or NFRA?
As of March 11, 2026, USNG holds $5.63 M in assets under management (AUM), while NFRA manages $3.04 B.
What sectors do the USNG and NFRA ETFs invest in?
USNG leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, NFRA focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the USNG ETF and NFRA ETF?
USNG top holdings include SOLARIS OILFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE, WILLIAMS and KINDER MORGAN. NFRA holds in its top three: DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG, SOFTBANK GROUP CORP and CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY.
Which ETF is more diversified: USNG or NFRA?
USNG holds 26 securities with 80.48% of its assets in the top 15. NFRA has 162 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.76%.
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
