USNGvsMLPXETF Comparison
ETF 1
USNG
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
This fund is part of
Infrastructure
-0.12%
VS
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. USNG's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, MLPX's top sector exposures are Energy, USNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.45% for MLPX. USNG is up 28.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. MLPX performs better with 28.97% YTD performance, and +$341M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNG and MLPX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
USNG vs MLPX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNG MLPX | -2.14%+6.04% | +4.12%+9.47% | +28.90%+28.97% | +39.53%+30.94% | n/a+112.30% | n/a+197.02% |
| Flows | USNG MLPX | -$733K+$54M | +$384K+$227M | +$1M+$341M | +$2M+$395M | -+$1.48B | -+$1.57B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNG MLPX | +19.51%+19.51% | +16.90%+15.65% | n/a+17.01% | n/a+19.82% |
| Max drawdown | USNG MLPX | -6.56%-7.51% | -6.86%-8.32% | n/a-16.47% | n/a-19.62% |
| Max drawdown duration | USNG MLPX | 53d59d | 41d109d | n/a370d | n/a427d |
Trading data
USNG | MLPX | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.14 | $76.36 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $35.17 | $76.33 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
USNG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUSNG | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
USNG | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.14 | $76.36 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $7.03 M | $3.66 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.45% |
Characteristics
USNG | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 29 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 20, 2025 | August 6, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
USNG
USA
83.39%
Canada
10.97%
Other
5.64%
MLPX
USA
74.49%
Canada
23.03%
Other
2.47%
Sectors
USNG
Energy
78.47%
Industrials
13.57%
Other
7.96%
MLPX
Energy
97.53%
Other
2.47%
Diversification
USNG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
80.83%
MLPX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
USNG
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
10.31%
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.19%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
8.23%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
7.07%
Enbridge, Inc.
6.82%
MPLX LP
6.54%
TC Energy Corp.
4.15%
DT Midstream, Inc.
4.02%
Plains GP Holdings LP
4.00%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
3.76%
Archrock, Inc.
3.64%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.55%
Energy Transfer LP
3.51%
Western Midstream Partners LP
3.08%
Vistra Corp.
2.96%
MLPX
TC Energy Corp.
9.27%
Enbridge, Inc.
9.23%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
8.71%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
7.84%
ONEOK, Inc.
6.80%
Targa Resources Corp.
6.53%
MPLX LP
4.66%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
4.54%
Energy Transfer LP
4.46%
Enterprise Products Partners LP
4.44%
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
4.42%
US912797UC96
4.39%
DT Midstream, Inc.
4.33%
Plains All American Pipeline LP
3.70%
Western Midstream Partners LP
3.66%
Frequently asked questions about USNG and MLPX
How have the USNG and MLPX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, USNG is up 28.9% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPX has returned 28.97%. That puts MLPX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNG or MLPX?
Year-to-date, the USNG ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$341M for MLPX.
Which ETF is more volatile: USNG or MLPX?
Over the past year, USNG had a volatility of 16.9%, while MLPX experienced 15.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: USNG or MLPX?
As of July 17, 2026, USNG holds $7.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPX manages $3.66 B.
What sectors do the USNG and MLPX ETFs invest in?
USNG leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, MLPX focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the USNG ETF and MLPX ETF?
USNG top holdings include Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc., Bloom Energy Corp. and The Williams Cos., Inc.. MLPX holds in its top three: TC Energy Corp., Enbridge, Inc. and The Williams Cos., Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: USNG or MLPX?
USNG holds 26 securities with 80.83% of its assets in the top 15. MLPX has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 86.97%.
Advertisement
Latest news about USNG & MLPX
Advertisement
Advertisement
