Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
USNGvsMLPXETF Comparison
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. USNG's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, MLPX's top sector exposures are Energy, USNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.45% for MLPX. USNG is up 20.57% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. MLPX performs better with 20.58% YTD performance, and +$64M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNG and MLPX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USNG vs MLPX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNG MLPX | +4.65%+5.86% | +17.62%+21.12% | +20.57%+20.58% | n/a+25.47% | n/a+113.47% | n/a+188.87% |
| Flows | USNG MLPX | -+$26M | -+$86M | -+$64M | --$23M | -+$1.16B | -+$1.21B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNG MLPX | +16.88%+15.02% | n/a+19.04% | n/a+16.90% | n/a+20.04% |
| Max drawdown | USNG MLPX | -4.81%-3.15% | n/a-14.85% | n/a-16.47% | n/a-19.62% |
| Max drawdown duration | USNG MLPX | 28d9d | n/a294d | n/a370d | n/a427d |
USNG | MLPX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.81 | $71.75 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $33.08 | $72.16 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
USNG | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
USNG | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.81 | $71.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.81% | -0.57% |
| AuM | $5.63 M | $3.19 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.45% |
USNG | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 20, 2025 | August 6, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the USNG and MLPX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, USNG is up 20.57% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPX has returned 20.58%. That puts MLPX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNG or MLPX?
Year-to-date, the USNG ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$64M for MLPX.
Which ETF is bigger: USNG or MLPX?
As of March 11, 2026, USNG holds $5.63 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPX manages $3.19 B.
What sectors do the USNG and MLPX ETFs invest in?
USNG leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, MLPX focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the USNG ETF and MLPX ETF?
USNG top holdings include SOLARIS OILFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE, WILLIAMS and KINDER MORGAN. MLPX holds in its top three: WILLIAMS, TC ENERGY CORP and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: USNG or MLPX?
USNG holds 26 securities with 80.48% of its assets in the top 15. MLPX has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 84.93%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.