USNGvsIFRAETF Comparison
ETF 1
USNG
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
This fund is part of
Infrastructure
-0.12%
VS
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. USNG's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, IFRA's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. USNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.3% for IFRA. USNG is up 28.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. IFRA performs worse with 17.57% YTD performance, and +$824M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNG and IFRA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
USNG vs IFRA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNG IFRA | -2.14%-0.24% | +4.12%+3.13% | +28.90%+17.57% | +39.53%+23.74% | n/a+64.20% | n/a+98.98% |
| Flows | USNG IFRA | -$733K+$349M | +$384K+$719M | +$1M+$824M | +$2M+$1.18B | -+$1.39B | -+$2.51B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNG IFRA | +19.51%+17.63% | +16.90%+15.16% | n/a+16.53% | n/a+17.91% |
| Max drawdown | USNG IFRA | -6.56%-4.80% | -6.86%-8.41% | n/a-19.89% | n/a-19.89% |
| Max drawdown duration | USNG IFRA | 53d43d | 41d51d | n/a238d | n/a238d |
Trading data
USNG | IFRA | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.14 | $61.41 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $35.17 | $61.85 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
USNG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUSNG | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
USNG | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.14 | $61.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $7.03 M | $4.55 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
USNG | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 162 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 20, 2025 | April 3, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
USNG
USA
83.39%
Canada
10.97%
Other
5.64%
IFRA
USA
95.71%
Other
4.29%
Sectors
USNG
Energy
78.47%
Industrials
13.57%
Other
7.96%
IFRA
Utilities
37.78%
Industrials
33.84%
Non-Energy Materi.
20.4%
Energy
7.77%
Other
0.21%
Advertisement
Diversification
USNG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
80.83%
IFRA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.21%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
USNG
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
10.31%
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.19%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
8.23%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
7.07%
Enbridge, Inc.
6.82%
MPLX LP
6.54%
TC Energy Corp.
4.15%
DT Midstream, Inc.
4.02%
Plains GP Holdings LP
4.00%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
3.76%
Archrock, Inc.
3.64%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.55%
Energy Transfer LP
3.51%
Western Midstream Partners LP
3.08%
Vistra Corp.
2.96%
IFRA
Caterpillar, Inc.
4.89%
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.17%
Union Pacific Corp.
3.93%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
3.63%
CSX Corp.
3.32%
CRH Plc
2.87%
Norfolk Southern Corp.
2.71%
The Southern Co.
2.62%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
2.51%
United Rentals, Inc.
2.47%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.46%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.43%
Nucor Corp.
2.24%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
2.21%
TC Energy Corp.
1.76%
Frequently asked questions about USNG and IFRA
How have the USNG and IFRA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, USNG is up 28.9% year-to-date (YTD), while IFRA has returned 17.57%. That puts USNG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNG or IFRA?
Year-to-date, the USNG ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$824M for IFRA.
Which ETF is more volatile: USNG or IFRA?
Over the past year, USNG had a volatility of 16.9%, while IFRA experienced 15.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: USNG or IFRA?
As of July 17, 2026, USNG holds $7.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while IFRA manages $4.55 B.
What sectors do the USNG and IFRA ETFs invest in?
USNG leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, IFRA focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the USNG ETF and IFRA ETF?
USNG top holdings include Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc., Bloom Energy Corp. and The Williams Cos., Inc.. IFRA holds in its top three: Caterpillar, Inc., Quanta Services, Inc. and Union Pacific Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: USNG or IFRA?
USNG holds 26 securities with 80.83% of its assets in the top 15. IFRA has 162 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.21%.
Advertisement
Latest news about USNG & IFRA
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
December 14, 2023
IFRA
How US Infrastructure Can Benefit Your Portfolio
April 3, 2023
IFRA
Advertisement
Advertisement
