USEvsLQDHETF Comparison
VS
USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. USE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.44% for LQDH. USE is up 67.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. LQDH performs worse with 3.32% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USE and LQDH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
USE vs LQDH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USE LQDH | +6.68%-0.33% | +21.48%+1.25% | +67.05%+3.32% | +45.49%+4.82% | +47.32%+23.64% | n/a+29.37% |
| Flows | USE LQDH | -$4M+$28M | -$1M+$97M | -$1M+$27M | -$1M+$83M | -$1M+$346M | -+$6M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USE LQDH | +32.50%+1.93% | +36.94%+2.56% | +29.63%+3.30% | n/a+4.31% |
| Max drawdown | USE LQDH | -12.64%-0.60% | -27.97%-2.26% | -27.97%-4.48% | n/a-6.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | USE LQDH | 40d27d | 113d82d | 113d104d | n/a437d |
Trading data
USE | LQDH | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:46 PM | $38.42 | $92.33 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $38.42 | $92.25 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
USE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUSE | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:46 PM
Live
Closed
USE | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.42 | $92.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | +0.09% |
| AuM | $2.87 M | $599.76 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.44% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
USE
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
USE
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
USE
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
USE
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about USE and LQDH
How have the USE and LQDH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, USE is up 67.05% year-to-date (YTD), while LQDH has returned 3.32%. That puts USE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USE or LQDH?
Year-to-date, the USE ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$27M for LQDH.
Which ETF is more volatile: USE or LQDH?
Over the past year, USE had a volatility of 36.94%, while LQDH experienced 2.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: USE or LQDH?
As of October 19, 2026, USE holds $2.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while LQDH manages $599.76 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
