USEvsCLSEETF Comparison
USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. USE is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. USE is up 67.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. CLSE performs worse with 23.39% YTD performance, and +$659M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USE and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USE vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USE CLSE | +4.08%-1.22% | +28.60%+0.02% | +67.82%+23.39% | +43.98%+32.16% | +53.56%+108.86% | n/an/a |
| Flows | USE CLSE | -$4M+$87M | -$1M+$266M | -$1M+$659M | -$1M+$692M | -$1M+$847M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USE CLSE | +33.08%+8.79% | +36.90%+13.01% | +29.62%+13.47% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | USE CLSE | -12.64%-3.12% | -27.97%-4.60% | -27.97%-15.76% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | USE CLSE | 40d43d | 113d40d | 113d188d | n/an/a |
USE | CLSE | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.42 | $33.74 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $37.76 | $34.05 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
USE | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.42 | $33.74 |
| 1D performance | +1.75% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $2.88 M | $1.02 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 1.52% |
USE | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | USCF | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 4, 2023 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
