URTHvsQWLDETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. URTH's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, QWLD's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. URTH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.24%, versus 0.3% for QWLD. URTH is up 13.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$562M in YTD flows. QWLD performs worse with 10.81% YTD performance, and -$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URTH and QWLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URTH vs QWLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URTH QWLD | -0.75%-1.01% | +4.58%+5.20% | +13.16%+10.81% | +19.53%+15.87% | +75.96%+60.27% | +70.81%+59.42% |
| Flows | URTH QWLD | -$22M- | -$101M- | +$562M-$15M | +$1.28B-$15M | +$2.97B+$29M | +$4.14B+$64M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URTH QWLD | +12.24%+7.42% | +13.06%+8.32% | +14.39%+9.70% | +16.30%+11.85% |
| Max drawdown | URTH QWLD | -2.67%-2.03% | -9.09%-7.55% | -16.96%-11.20% | -26.04%-22.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | URTH QWLD | 16d16d | 48d73d | 101d84d | 713d709d |
Trading data
URTH | QWLD | |
Last sale 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM | $208.63 | $157.15 |
| Previous close 09/04/2026 | $209.82 | $158.45 |
| Consolidated volume 09/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URTH | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URTH | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $208.63 | $157.15 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | -0.82% |
| AuM | $8.26 B | $177.18 M |
| E/R | 0.24% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
URTH | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Index | MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index |
| N° of holdings | 1272 | 1228 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2012 | June 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URTH
USA
70.01%
Other
29.99%
QWLD
USA
63.53%
Japan
7.84%
Other
28.63%
Sectors
URTH
Technology
34.85%
Finance
18.5%
Industrials
9.94%
Healthcare
9.02%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.64%
Other
19.04%
QWLD
Technology
27.89%
Finance
17.68%
Healthcare
12.9%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.77%
Industrials
8.9%
Other
22.86%
Diversification
URTH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.41%
QWLD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.53%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
URTH
Apple, Inc.
5.48%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.04%
Microsoft Corp.
3.56%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.18%
Broadcom Inc.
1.95%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.73%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.33%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.10%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.05%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.04%
Tesla, Inc.
0.97%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.89%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.79%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.73%
QWLD
Microsoft Corp.
2.86%
Apple, Inc.
2.40%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.18%
Broadcom Inc.
1.76%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.74%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.36%
Johnson & Johnson
1.34%
Visa, Inc.
1.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.14%
ASML Holding NV
1.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.02%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.02%
Novartis AG
0.83%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.77%
Procter & Gamble Co.
0.77%
Frequently asked questions about URTH and QWLD
How have the URTH and QWLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, URTH is up 13.16% year-to-date (YTD), while QWLD has returned 10.81%. That puts URTH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URTH or QWLD?
Year-to-date, the URTH ETF saw +$562M in flows, compared to -$15M for QWLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: URTH or QWLD?
Over the past year, URTH had a volatility of 13.06%, while QWLD experienced 8.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: URTH or QWLD?
As of September 8, 2026, URTH holds $8.26 B in assets under management (AUM), while QWLD manages $177.18 M.
What sectors do the URTH and QWLD ETFs invest in?
URTH leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, QWLD focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the URTH ETF and QWLD ETF?
URTH top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. QWLD holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: URTH or QWLD?
URTH holds 1283 securities with 30.41% of its assets in the top 15. QWLD has 1240 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.53%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URTH & QWLD
Advertisement
