UMMAvsPATNETF Comparison
VS
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) belongs to the Global Large Cap segment. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. UMMA's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, PATN's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Both UMMA and PATN have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%. UMMA is up 19.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$56M in YTD flows. PATN performs better with 23.38% YTD performance, and +$170M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UMMA and PATN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UMMA vs PATN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMMA PATN | -10.08%-9.22% | +3.47%+4.47% | +19.14%+23.38% | +34.88%+44.43% | +60.58%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | UMMA PATN | +$4M+$43M | +$28M+$122M | +$56M+$170M | +$67M+$177M | +$153M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UMMA PATN | +26.90%+28.05% | +20.44%+21.80% | +17.23%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | UMMA PATN | -13.54%-13.02% | -13.78%-14.37% | -18.32%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | UMMA PATN | 38d38d | 65d54d | 247dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
UMMA | PATN | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 5:10 PM | $36.03 | $34.53 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $36.09 | $34.44 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UMMA
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUMMA | PATN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 5:10 PM
Live
Closed
UMMA | PATN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.03 | $34.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | +0.25% |
| AuM | $273.81 M | $196.37 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
UMMA | PATN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Wahed | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 89 | 100 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 7, 2022 | September 16, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UMMA
Republic of Korea
18.12%
Japan
17.28%
Switzerland
12.17%
United Kingdom
8.92%
Canada
8.81%
Other
34.7%
PATN
Japan
24.75%
Republic of Korea
18.09%
Taiwan
14.16%
Switzerland
9.53%
China
8.61%
France
7.17%
Other
17.69%
Sectors
UMMA
Technology
48.15%
Healthcare
14.62%
Industrials
10.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.29%
Other
18.51%
PATN
Technology
53.37%
Industrials
14.47%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.05%
Healthcare
7.96%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.39%
Other
8.76%
Advertisement
Diversification
UMMA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.67%
PATN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
UMMA
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
9.48%
SK hynix, Inc.
8.64%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.39%
ASML Holding NV
4.58%
Infineon Technologies AG
3.90%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
3.31%
Constellation Software, Inc.
3.18%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.96%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.82%
Roche Holding AG
2.81%
Novartis AG
2.57%
Unilever Plc
2.41%
Nestlé SA
2.27%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.84%
Schneider Electric SE
1.51%
PATN
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
10.05%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
7.55%
SK hynix, Inc.
7.43%
ASML Holding NV
4.72%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
3.42%
Novartis AG
2.52%
Roche Holding AG
2.33%
Nestlé SA
2.18%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.15%
Siemens AG
1.97%
L'Oréal SA
1.96%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.94%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.78%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.75%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.66%
Frequently asked questions about UMMA and PATN
How have the UMMA and PATN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, UMMA is up 19.14% year-to-date (YTD), while PATN has returned 23.38%. That puts PATN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UMMA or PATN?
Year-to-date, the UMMA ETF saw +$56M in flows, compared to +$170M for PATN.
Which ETF is more volatile: UMMA or PATN?
Over the past year, UMMA had a volatility of 20.44%, while PATN experienced 21.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: UMMA or PATN?
As of July 30, 2026, UMMA holds $273.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while PATN manages $196.37 M.
What sectors do the UMMA and PATN ETFs invest in?
UMMA leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, PATN focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the UMMA ETF and PATN ETF?
UMMA top holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SK hynix, Inc. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. PATN holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: UMMA or PATN?
UMMA holds 92 securities with 57.67% of its assets in the top 15. PATN has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
