UMIvsPIPEETF Comparison
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund (UMI) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Energy. UMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.75% for PIPE. UMI is up 28.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$30M in YTD flows. PIPE performs better with 31.79% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UMI and PIPE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
UMI vs PIPE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMI PIPE | +3.04%+3.15% | +5.39%+4.82% | +28.56%+31.79% | +30.37%+33.90% | +94.51%n/a | +165.28%n/a |
| Flows | UMI PIPE | +$10M+$598K | +$24M+$598K | +$30M+$2M | +$50M+$4M | +$119M- | +$206M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UMI PIPE | +16.86%+17.66% | +15.21%+15.62% | +16.50%n/a | +19.20%n/a |
| Max drawdown | UMI PIPE | -5.01%-5.51% | -7.51%-7.30% | -16.88%n/a | -20.12%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | UMI PIPE | 25d25d | 66d109d | 370dn/a | 492dn/a |
UMI | PIPE | |
Last sale 9/4/2026 at 3:29 PM | $61.07 | $31.04 |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $61.57 | $31.18 |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
UMI | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.07 | $31.04 |
| 1D performance | -0.81% | -0.46% |
| AuM | $524.91 M | $67.34 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.75% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
