Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
UIVMvsFNDFETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. UIVM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. UIVM is up 6.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$327K in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 7.55% YTD performance, and +$581M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UIVM and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
UIVM vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UIVM FNDF | -5.20%-5.01% | +7.81%+9.25% | +6.27%+7.55% | +38.61%+38.73% | +84.85%+78.01% | +75.95%+79.59% |
| Flows | UIVM FNDF | +$4M+$384M | +$327K+$1.13B | +$327K+$581M | -$10M+$2.05B | -$83M+$5.07B | -$214M+$8.74B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UIVM FNDF | +14.79%+16.20% | +14.20%+15.58% | +12.59%+13.58% | +13.64%+14.47% |
| Max drawdown | UIVM FNDF | -8.64%-9.15% | -11.54%-13.78% | -11.54%-13.78% | -27.88%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | UIVM FNDF | 11d11d | 35d44d | 35d44d | 764d545d |
UIVM | FNDF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:15 PM | $67.53 | $48.02 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $68.26 | $48.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
UIVM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
UIVM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.53 | $48.02 |
| 1D performance | -1.07% | -0.83% |
| AuM | $307.52 M | $21.64 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.25% |
UIVM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 186 | 821 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the UIVM and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, UIVM is up 6.27% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 7.55%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UIVM or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the UIVM ETF saw +$327K in flows, compared to +$581M for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: UIVM or FNDF?
Over the past year, UIVM had a volatility of 14.2%, while FNDF experienced 15.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: UIVM or FNDF?
As of March 12, 2026, UIVM holds $307.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $21.64 B.
What sectors do the UIVM and FNDF ETFs invest in?
UIVM leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the UIVM ETF and FNDF ETF?
UIVM top holdings include CDN IMPERIAL BK, TORONTO DOMINION and BNS. FNDF holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: UIVM or FNDF?
UIVM holds 189 securities with 13.75% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 865 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.13%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.