UITBvsCMFETF Comparison
ETF 1
UITB
VictoryShares USAA Core Intermediate-Term Bond ETF
This fund is part of
US Aggregate Bonds
+0.03%
VS
VictoryShares USAA Core Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (UITB) belongs to the US Aggregate Bonds segment. iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. UITB's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, CMF's top sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. UITB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.08% for CMF. UITB is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$47M in YTD flows. CMF performs worse with -2.36% YTD performance, and +$1.60B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UITB and CMF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UITB vs CMF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UITB CMF | -0.15%-0.25% | -1.91%-3.34% | -1.65%-2.36% | -1.74%-1.71% | +15.50%+9.17% | +0.40%+0.25% |
| Flows | UITB CMF | -$20M+$660M | +$33M+$801M | +$47M+$1.60B | +$161M+$1.96B | +$1.11B+$3.16B | +$1.81B+$3.62B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UITB CMF | +4.36%+4.84% | +3.91%+3.08% | +4.86%+3.57% | +5.54%+3.58% |
| Max drawdown | UITB CMF | -3.37%-5.69% | -4.68%-6.52% | -4.68%-6.52% | -16.06%-12.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | UITB CMF | 52d92d | 229d229d | 229d229d | 1395d1346d |
Trading data
UITB | CMF | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 7:59 PM | $45.01 | $54.78 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $45.03 | $54.82 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 19, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UITB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUITB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
UITB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.01 | $54.78 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $2.61 B | $5.19 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.08% |
Characteristics
UITB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index |
| N° of holdings | 630 | 903 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2017 | October 4, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UITB
USA
60.1%
Other
39.9%
CMF
USA
59.23%
Other
40.77%
Sectors
UITB
Sovereign
34.61%
Finance
10.04%
Other
55.35%
CMF
Municipal
59.23%
Other
40.77%
Diversification
UITB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.73%
CMF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
UITB
USA, Notes 4.125% 31may2032, USD (L-2032)
2.12%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034)
2.00%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
1.84%
USA, Notes 3.375% 15may2033, USD (C-2033)
1.69%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15may2035, USD (C-2035)
1.52%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15nov2032, USD (F-2032)
1.48%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30sep2032, USD (Q-2032)
1.04%
USA, Notes 2.75% 15aug2032, USD (E-2032)
1.01%
USA, Notes 4.25% 31mar2033, USD (J-2033)
0.97%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036)
0.88%
USA, Bonds 4.625% 15nov2044, USD
0.85%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15feb2056, USD
0.85%
USA, Bonds 3.875% 15aug2040, USD
0.84%
USA, Notes 3.625% 30sep2030, USD (AD-2030)
0.83%
USA, Bonds 4.625% 15feb2046, USD
0.81%
CMF
Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A)
0.60%
US79766DLC10
0.52%
US032556NJ70
0.49%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2031, USD (2024)
0.47%
University of California, 5.5% 15may2040, USD
0.46%
California Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1may2045, USD
0.44%
US4636324Q95
0.44%
US79905CAB90
0.42%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2034, USD (2024A)
0.41%
US13077DUT70
0.40%
University of California, 5% 15may2036, USD (2025)
0.39%
California, 5% 1mar2055, USD
0.37%
California, 5.25% 1aug2032, USD
0.34%
US91412GSH91
0.32%
East AWP Joint Powers Authority, 3.125% 1sep2026, USD (2024A)
0.32%
Frequently asked questions about UITB and CMF
How have the UITB and CMF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, UITB is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD), while CMF has lost -2.36%. That puts UITB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UITB or CMF?
Year-to-date, the UITB ETF saw +$47M in flows, compared to +$1.60B for CMF.
Which ETF is more volatile: UITB or CMF?
Over the past year, UITB had a volatility of 3.91%, while CMF experienced 3.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: UITB or CMF?
As of October 16, 2026, UITB holds $2.61 B in assets under management (AUM), while CMF manages $5.19 B.
What sectors do the UITB and CMF ETFs invest in?
UITB leans toward sectors like Sovereign and Finance. Meanwhile, CMF focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the UITB ETF and CMF ETF?
UITB top holdings include USA, Notes 4.125% 31may2032, USD (L-2032), USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034) and USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033). CMF holds in its top three: Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A), US79766DLC10 and US032556NJ70.
Which ETF is more diversified: UITB or CMF?
UITB holds 1215 securities with 18.73% of its assets in the top 15. CMF has 1670 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.39%.
Advertisement
Latest news about UITB & CMF
Advertisement
