UITBvsBSMRETF Comparison
ETF 1
UITB
VictoryShares USAA Core Intermediate-Term Bond ETF
This fund is part of
US Aggregate Bonds
+0.03%
VS
VictoryShares USAA Core Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (UITB) belongs to the US Aggregate Bonds segment. Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. UITB's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, BSMR's top sector exposures are Municipal. UITB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.18% for BSMR. UITB is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$47M in YTD flows. BSMR performs better with -0.53% YTD performance, and +$68M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UITB and BSMR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UITB vs BSMR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UITB BSMR | -0.15%+0.04% | -1.91%-0.74% | -1.65%-0.53% | -1.74%+0.03% | +15.50%+9.38% | +0.40%+0.37% |
| Flows | UITB BSMR | -$20M+$9M | +$33M+$26M | +$47M+$68M | +$161M+$92M | +$1.11B+$276M | +$1.81B+$353M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UITB BSMR | +4.36%+1.84% | +3.91%+1.14% | +4.86%+1.81% | +5.54%+2.37% |
| Max drawdown | UITB BSMR | -3.37%-1.83% | -4.68%-2.18% | -4.68%-2.18% | -16.06%-12.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | UITB BSMR | 52d92d | 229d236d | 229d236d | 1395d1440d |
Trading data
UITB | BSMR | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 2:15 PM | $44.97 | $23.40 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $45.01 | $23.33 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 19, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UITB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUITB | BSMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 2:15 PM
Live
Closed
UITB | BSMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.97 | $23.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.30% |
| AuM | $2.61 B | $367.21 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
UITB | BSMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | ICE BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2027 Index |
| N° of holdings | 630 | 1347 |
| Asset class | - | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2017 | September 13, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UITB
USA
60.1%
Other
39.9%
BSMR
USA
63.19%
Other
36.81%
Sectors
UITB
Sovereign
34.61%
Finance
10.04%
Other
55.35%
BSMR
Municipal
63.19%
Other
36.81%
Advertisement
Diversification
UITB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.73%
BSMR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
UITB
USA, Notes 4.125% 31may2032, USD (L-2032)
2.12%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034)
2.00%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
1.84%
USA, Notes 3.375% 15may2033, USD (C-2033)
1.69%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15may2035, USD (C-2035)
1.52%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15nov2032, USD (F-2032)
1.48%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30sep2032, USD (Q-2032)
1.04%
USA, Notes 2.75% 15aug2032, USD (E-2032)
1.01%
USA, Notes 4.25% 31mar2033, USD (J-2033)
0.97%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036)
0.88%
USA, Bonds 4.625% 15nov2044, USD
0.85%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15feb2056, USD
0.85%
USA, Bonds 3.875% 15aug2040, USD
0.84%
USA, Notes 3.625% 30sep2030, USD (AD-2030)
0.83%
USA, Bonds 4.625% 15feb2046, USD
0.81%
BSMR
Illinois, 5% 1nov2029, USD (2017C)
0.48%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.46%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 5% 15feb2042, USD
0.34%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017A)
0.33%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2027, USD
0.30%
New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, 5% 15jun2040, USD
0.29%
Texas Water Development Board, 5% 15oct2047, USD (2017A)
0.24%
Houston Combined Utility System, 5% 15nov2042, USD (2017B)
0.23%
New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, 5% 15jun2040, USD
0.22%
US64990CJK80
0.20%
US574218V676
0.20%
US494619ER60
0.20%
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 5% 1dec2040, USD (2017)
0.19%
Geisinger Authority Health System, 5% 15feb2045, USD (2017A-1)
0.19%
Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, 4% 1jan2042, USD (2017C)
0.19%
Frequently asked questions about UITB and BSMR
How have the UITB and BSMR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, UITB is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD), while BSMR has lost -0.53%. That puts BSMR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UITB or BSMR?
Year-to-date, the UITB ETF saw +$47M in flows, compared to +$68M for BSMR.
Which ETF is more volatile: UITB or BSMR?
Over the past year, UITB had a volatility of 3.91%, while BSMR experienced 1.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: UITB or BSMR?
As of October 16, 2026, UITB holds $2.61 B in assets under management (AUM), while BSMR manages $367.21 M.
What sectors do the UITB and BSMR ETFs invest in?
UITB leans toward sectors like Sovereign and Finance. Meanwhile, BSMR focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the UITB ETF and BSMR ETF?
UITB top holdings include USA, Notes 4.125% 31may2032, USD (L-2032), USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034) and USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033). BSMR holds in its top three: Illinois, 5% 1nov2029, USD (2017C), Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D) and Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 5% 15feb2042, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: UITB or BSMR?
UITB holds 1215 securities with 18.73% of its assets in the top 15. BSMR has 2631 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.06%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
