UCRDvsQLTAETF Comparison
VS
VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF (UCRD) and iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) belong to the same industry segment: US Corporate IG Bonds. UCRD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, QLTA's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. UCRD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.15% for QLTA. UCRD is down -0.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. QLTA performs worse with -1.04% YTD performance, and -$468M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UCRD and QLTA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UCRD vs QLTA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UCRD QLTA | -0.09%-0.23% | -1.17%-1.54% | -0.47%-1.04% | +2.18%+1.39% | +17.86%+14.37% | n/a-3.10% |
| Flows | UCRD QLTA | +$526K-$23M | -$1K-$232M | +$5M-$468M | +$9M-$412M | +$36M+$271M | -+$246M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UCRD QLTA | +4.42%+4.42% | +4.12%+4.22% | +5.43%+5.51% | n/a+6.64% |
| Max drawdown | UCRD QLTA | -2.09%-2.21% | -2.92%-2.81% | -4.72%-5.16% | n/a-21.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | UCRD QLTA | 65d65d | 185d185d | 66d284d | n/a1806d |
Trading data
UCRD | QLTA | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.08 | $46.19 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $21.02 | $46.14 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UCRD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUCRD | QLTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UCRD | QLTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.08 | $46.19 |
| 1D performance | +0.26% | +0.11% |
| AuM | $147.84 M | $1.20 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
UCRD | QLTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Aaa-A Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 497 | 3500 |
| Asset class | - | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2021 | February 14, 2012 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UCRD
USA
82.43%
Other
17.57%
QLTA
USA
83.51%
Other
16.49%
Sectors
UCRD
Finance
39.14%
Utilities
9.59%
Technology
7.28%
Other
43.98%
QLTA
Finance
43.6%
Technology
11.57%
Healthcare
10.49%
Utilities
7.69%
Other
26.65%
Diversification
UCRD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.95%
QLTA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
2.54%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
UCRD
AT&T Inc, 3.1% 1feb2043, USD
0.93%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.687% 22apr2032, USD (N)
0.92%
Bank of America Corporation, 3.419% 20dec2028, USD
0.84%
USA, Bonds 4.125% 15aug2053, USD
0.77%
Truist Financial, 1.887% 7jun2029, USD (G)
0.65%
HSBC Holdings plc, 2.206% 17aug2029, USD
0.65%
PNC Financial Services Group, 2.55% 22jan2030, USD
0.63%
USA, Bonds 4.25% 15aug2054, USD
0.61%
USA, Bonds 4.875% 15aug2045, USD
0.60%
USA, Bonds 3.375% 15may2044, USD
0.59%
Barclays, 4.95% 10jan2047, USD
0.58%
USA, Bonds 3.875% 15may2043, USD
0.58%
Broadcom Inc, 2.6% 15feb2033, USD
0.58%
Fells Point Funding Trust, 3.046% 31jan2027, USD
0.51%
JP Morgan, 5.294% 22jul2035, USD
0.49%
QLTA
Broadcom Inc, 4.9% 15jul2032, USD
0.27%
Broadcom Inc, 3.137% 15nov2035, USD
0.22%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD
0.22%
Meta Platforms, 4.875% 15nov2035, USD
0.20%
Amazon.com, 4.875% 13mar2036, USD
0.16%
NVIDIA, 4.5% 15jun2031, USD
0.16%
Meta Platforms, 6.3% 15may2056, USD
0.15%
NVIDIA, 4.95% 15jun2036, USD
0.15%
Pfizer, 5.3% 19may2053, USD
0.15%
Meta Platforms, 5.625% 15nov2055, USD
0.15%
Amazon.com, 5.8% 13mar2056, USD
0.15%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.7% 1feb2036, USD
0.15%
AbbVie, 3.2% 21nov2029, USD
0.14%
Amazon.com, 4.25% 13mar2031, USD
0.14%
Pfizer, 4.75% 19may2033, USD
0.14%
Frequently asked questions about UCRD and QLTA
How have the UCRD and QLTA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, UCRD is down -0.47% year-to-date (YTD), while QLTA has lost -1.04%. That puts UCRD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UCRD or QLTA?
Year-to-date, the UCRD ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to -$468M for QLTA.
Which ETF is more volatile: UCRD or QLTA?
Over the past year, UCRD had a volatility of 4.12%, while QLTA experienced 4.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: UCRD or QLTA?
As of September 2, 2026, UCRD holds $147.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while QLTA manages $1.20 B.
What sectors do the UCRD and QLTA ETFs invest in?
UCRD leans toward sectors like Finance, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, QLTA focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the UCRD ETF and QLTA ETF?
UCRD top holdings include AT&T Inc, 3.1% 1feb2043, USD, Bank of America Corporation, 2.687% 22apr2032, USD (N) and Bank of America Corporation, 3.419% 20dec2028, USD. QLTA holds in its top three: Broadcom Inc, 4.9% 15jul2032, USD, Broadcom Inc, 3.137% 15nov2035, USD and Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: UCRD or QLTA?
UCRD holds 497 securities with 9.95% of its assets in the top 15. QLTA has 3502 securities and a top 15 weight of 2.54%.
Advertisement
Latest news about UCRD & QLTA
Advertisement
Advertisement
