New

Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →

Advertisement

UCOvsSCOETF Comparison

ETF 1
UCO

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF

This fund is part of
Leveraged Commodity
-1.76%
VS
ETF 2
SCO

ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF

This fund is part of
Inverse Commodity
-1.82%

The ETFs ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (UCO) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (SCO) track the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Excess Return Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Commodity. UCO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.47%, versus 1.1% for SCO. UCO is up 240.91% year-to-date (YTD) with -$508M in YTD flows. SCO performs worse with -79.61% YTD performance, and +$1.41B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UCO and SCO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

UCO vs SCO performance and flow charts

Performance

-20-100102030%Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14Oct 21

Cumulative Flows

-60 M-40 M-20 M0 M20 M40 MSep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14Oct 21

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
UCO
SCO
+26.19%-21.19%
+47.32%-36.30%
+240.91%-79.61%
+204.81%-77.67%
+93.73%-76.51%
+163.31%-93.67%
Flows
UCO
SCO
-$52M+$19M
-$147M+$611M
-$508M+$1.41B
-$569M+$1.42B
-$646M+$1.17B
-$1.86B+$1.38B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
UCO
SCO
+52.90%+52.51%
+64.36%+63.99%
+55.66%+55.55%
+62.67%+62.44%
Max drawdown
UCO
SCO
-20.49%-47.88%
-38.76%-80.89%
-48.72%-82.51%
-66.84%-95.30%
Max drawdown duration
UCO
SCO
27d79d
114d311d
698d536d
1582d1787d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
UCO
SCO
Last sale
10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
$66.11
$15.92
Previous close
10/22/2026
$63.77
$16.54
Consolidated volume
10/22/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of October 24, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
UCO
SCO
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UCO
SCO
Last price
$66.11
$15.92
1D performance
+3.67%
-3.75%
AuM$483.19 M$846.56 M
E/R1.47%1.1%
Characteristics
UCO
SCO
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderProSharesProShares
BenchmarkBloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil IndexBloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index
N° of holdings--
Asset classCommoditiesCommodities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateNovember 24, 2008November 24, 2008
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Exposure data will be available soon

Frequently asked questions about UCO and SCO

How have the UCO and SCO ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 23, 2026, UCO is up 240.91% year-to-date (YTD), while SCO has lost -79.61%. That puts UCO better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UCO or SCO?

Year-to-date, the UCO ETF saw -$508M in flows, compared to +$1.41B for SCO.

Which ETF is more volatile: UCO or SCO?

Over the past year, UCO had a volatility of 64.36%, while SCO experienced 63.99%.

Which ETF is bigger: UCO or SCO?

As of October 23, 2026, UCO holds $483.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCO manages $846.56 M.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

Global ETF Survey 2026