UBNDvsJCPBETF Comparison
VS
VictoryShares ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (UBND) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) belong to the same industry segment: US Aggregate Bonds. In contrast, JCPB's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. UBND is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.4% for JCPB. UBND is down -1.57% year-to-date (YTD) with +$489M in YTD flows. JCPB performs better with -1.15% YTD performance, and +$7.47B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UBND and JCPB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UBND vs JCPB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UBND JCPB | -0.40%-0.24% | -2.12%-1.82% | -1.57%-1.15% | -1.44%-1.06% | +17.15%+18.48% | +2.45%+3.03% |
| Flows | UBND JCPB | -$35M+$1.54B | +$54M+$2.74B | +$489M+$7.47B | +$678M+$8.63B | +$1.82B+$14.82B | +$1.98B+$16.54B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UBND JCPB | +4.53%+4.23% | +3.92%+3.79% | +4.77%+4.88% | +5.49%+5.71% |
| Max drawdown | UBND JCPB | -3.60%-3.33% | -4.52%-4.47% | -4.52%-4.48% | -16.71%-16.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | UBND JCPB | 52d52d | 229d229d | 229d198d | 1326d1360d |
Trading data
UBND | JCPB | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.80 | |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $20.79 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UBND | JCPB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.80 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | – |
| AuM | $1.96 B | $16.14 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
UBND | JCPB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | VictoryShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | 1561 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2021 | January 28, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UBND
Data will be available soon
JCPB
USA
44.02%
Other
55.98%
Sectors
UBND
Data will be available soon
JCPB
Sovereign
16.35%
Finance
11.66%
Other
71.99%
Advertisement
Diversification
UBND
Data will be available soon
JCPB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
UBND
Data will be available soon
JCPB
USA, Notes 3.625% 31aug2029, USD (AC-2029)
2.79%
US01F0506927
1.45%
US01F0526982
1.31%
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac TBA, 2.5% 1apr2046, USD (ABS)
1.18%
USA, Notes 4% 15nov2035, USD (F-2035)
1.11%
USA, Bonds 4.875% 15aug2045, USD
0.95%
USA, Bonds 4.5% 15nov2054, USD
0.79%
USA, Bonds 4% 15nov2052, USD
0.76%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15nov2034, USD (F-2034)
0.69%
USA, Notes 0.5% 31aug2027, USD (P-2027)
0.65%
USA, Notes 4.125% 30nov2029, USD (AG-2029)
0.60%
USA, Bonds 4% 15nov2042, USD
0.57%
USA, Notes 3.625% 31aug2030, USD (AC-2030)
0.57%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15nov2043, USD
0.48%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15nov2053, USD
0.47%
Frequently asked questions about UBND and JCPB
How have the UBND and JCPB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, UBND is down -1.57% year-to-date (YTD), while JCPB has lost -1.15%. That puts JCPB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UBND or JCPB?
Year-to-date, the UBND ETF saw +$489M in flows, compared to +$7.47B for JCPB.
Which ETF is more volatile: UBND or JCPB?
Over the past year, UBND had a volatility of 3.92%, while JCPB experienced 3.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: UBND or JCPB?
As of October 16, 2026, UBND holds $1.96 B in assets under management (AUM), while JCPB manages $16.14 B.
Advertisement
