TSLRvsQLDETF Comparison
VS
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF (QLD) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Equity. TSLR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.05%, versus 0.98% for QLD. TSLR is down -41.53% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. QLD performs better with 28.32% YTD performance, and +$1.09B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TSLR and QLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TSLR vs QLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TSLR QLD | +17.74%-4.80% | +50.12%+9.49% | -41.53%+28.32% | -45.38%+21.13% | -3.00%+232.41% | n/a+122.63% |
| Flows | TSLR QLD | +$152M+$430M | +$145M+$966M | -$53M+$1.09B | +$10M+$1.56B | +$130M+$1.82B | -+$1.97B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TSLR QLD | +76.11%+38.02% | +89.30%+39.88% | +114.95%+41.07% | n/a+46.42% |
| Max drawdown | TSLR QLD | -14.36%-14.47% | -69.81%-25.08% | -82.79%-42.40% | n/a-63.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | TSLR QLD | 9d21d | 314d169d | 678d212d | n/a878d |
Trading data
TSLR | QLD | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.92 | $91.39 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $20.21 | $90.29 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TSLR | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
TSLR | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.92 | $91.39 |
| 1D performance | -1.43% | +1.22% |
| AuM | $238.68 M | $14.62 B |
| E/R | 1.05% | 0.98% |
Characteristics
TSLR | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | GraniteShares | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Tesla Price | NASDAQ-100 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 21, 2023 | June 19, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Exposure data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about TSLR and QLD
How have the TSLR and QLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, TSLR is down -41.53% year-to-date (YTD), while QLD has returned 28.32%. That puts QLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TSLR or QLD?
Year-to-date, the TSLR ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to +$1.09B for QLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: TSLR or QLD?
Over the past year, TSLR had a volatility of 89.3%, while QLD experienced 39.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: TSLR or QLD?
As of October 26, 2026, TSLR holds $238.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while QLD manages $14.62 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about TSLR & QLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
