Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TOVvsONOFETF Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF
JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is part of the segment. TOV's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, ONOF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. TOV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.39% for ONOF. TOV is down -0.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. ONOF performs worse with -1.03% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TOV and ONOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TOV vs ONOF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TOV ONOF | -2.08%-2.19% | -1.68%-1.88% | -0.88%-1.03% | +23.01%+13.72% | n/a+46.26% | n/a+54.21% |
| Flows | TOV ONOF | +$3M+$3M | +$17M+$4M | +$6M+$2M | +$63M+$5M | -+$39M | -+$52M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TOV ONOF | +11.57%+11.78% | +18.29%+17.22% | n/a+14.17% | n/a+14.45% |
| Max drawdown | TOV ONOF | -3.34%-3.48% | -13.86%-13.77% | n/a-21.66% | n/a-25.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | TOV ONOF | 43d58d | 45d89d | n/a205d | n/a756d |
TOV | ONOF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 5:04 PM | $28.18 | $37.19 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $28.44 | $37.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
TOV | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
TOV | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.18 | $37.19 |
| 1D performance | -0.90% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $209.81 M | $142.50 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.39% |
TOV | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | JLens | Global X |
| Benchmark | JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index |
| N° of holdings | 467 | 470 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 26, 2025 | January 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TOV and ONOF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, TOV is down -0.88% year-to-date (YTD), while ONOF has lost -1.03%. That puts TOV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TOV or ONOF?
Year-to-date, the TOV ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$2M for ONOF.
Which ETF is more volatile: TOV or ONOF?
Over the past year, TOV had a volatility of 18.29%, while ONOF experienced 17.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: TOV or ONOF?
As of March 11, 2026, TOV holds $209.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONOF manages $142.50 M.
What sectors do the TOV and ONOF ETFs invest in?
TOV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, ONOF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the TOV ETF and ONOF ETF?
TOV top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ONOF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: TOV or ONOF?
TOV holds 496 securities with 44.16% of its assets in the top 15. ONOF has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.08%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
