TMFMvsFSGSETF Comparison
VS
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. TMFM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.61% for FSGS. TMFM is down -1.76% year-to-date (YTD) with -$21M in YTD flows. FSGS performs better with 9.31% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TMFM and FSGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TMFM vs FSGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/07/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TMFM FSGS | +2.52%+2.45% | +7.74%+6.77% | -1.76%+9.31% | -10.99%+8.23% | +10.09%+23.27% | n/a+24.88% |
| Flows | TMFM FSGS | -$2M- | -$8M+$51K | -$21M+$2M | -$35M-$1M | -$70M-$2M | -+$15M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TMFM FSGS | +23.34%+13.44% | +19.92%+15.08% | +18.12%+18.77% | n/a+19.98% |
| Max drawdown | TMFM FSGS | -6.88%-3.27% | -25.10%-11.35% | -31.61%-23.71% | n/a-23.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | TMFM FSGS | 30d21d | 348d160d | 619d585d | n/a585d |
Trading data
TMFM | FSGS | |
Last sale 8/7/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.00 | $33.76 |
| Previous close 08/06/2026 | $22.48 | $33.25 |
| Consolidated volume 08/06/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TMFM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexTMFM | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/7/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
TMFM | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.00 | $33.76 |
| 1D performance | +2.35% | +1.55% |
| AuM | $119.52 M | $31.59 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.61% |
Characteristics
TMFM | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Motley Fool Asset Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | The SMID Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 100 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 17, 2014 | June 20, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
TMFM
USA
97.14%
Other
2.86%
FSGS
USA
97.07%
Other
2.93%
Sectors
TMFM
Finance
29.03%
Industrials
20.48%
Healthcare
19.11%
Technology
14.96%
Business Services
8.63%
Other
7.79%
FSGS
Finance
21.73%
Industrials
18%
Healthcare
17.87%
Technology
14.24%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.13%
Other
21.03%
Advertisement
Diversification
TMFM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.43%
FSGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.05%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
TMFM
StoneX Group, Inc.
10.19%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
5.11%
HealthEquity, Inc.
4.96%
DexCom, Inc.
4.89%
QXO, Inc.
4.64%
GXO Logistics, Inc.
4.58%
SBA Communications Corp.
4.03%
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
3.95%
Toast, Inc.
3.88%
Datadog, Inc.
3.86%
Brown & Brown, Inc.
3.78%
Waters Corp.
3.74%
Guidewire Software, Inc.
3.68%
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
3.67%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
3.47%
FSGS
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.66%
Progyny, Inc.
1.57%
MYR Group, Inc.
1.39%
IES Holdings, Inc.
1.29%
Blue Bird Corp.
1.24%
Barrett Business Services, Inc.
1.24%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.24%
Duolingo, Inc.
1.19%
Assurant, Inc.
1.18%
QuinStreet, Inc.
1.18%
Exelixis, Inc.
1.18%
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.18%
Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
1.18%
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
1.17%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
1.16%
Frequently asked questions about TMFM and FSGS
How have the TMFM and FSGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 7, 2026, TMFM is down -1.76% year-to-date (YTD), while FSGS has returned 9.31%. That puts FSGS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TMFM or FSGS?
Year-to-date, the TMFM ETF saw -$21M in flows, compared to +$2M for FSGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: TMFM or FSGS?
Over the past year, TMFM had a volatility of 19.92%, while FSGS experienced 15.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: TMFM or FSGS?
As of August 7, 2026, TMFM holds $119.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSGS manages $31.59 M.
What sectors do the TMFM and FSGS ETFs invest in?
TMFM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FSGS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the TMFM ETF and FSGS ETF?
TMFM top holdings include StoneX Group, Inc., West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and HealthEquity, Inc.. FSGS holds in its top three: Sterling Infrastructure, Inc., Progyny, Inc. and MYR Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TMFM or FSGS?
TMFM holds 31 securities with 68.43% of its assets in the top 15. FSGS has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.05%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
