Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TMFCvsQDVOETF Comparison
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. TMFC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.55% for QDVO. TMFC is down -5.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. QDVO performs better with -3.16% YTD performance, and +$83M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TMFC and QDVO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TMFC vs QDVO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TMFC QDVO | -0.98%-0.86% | -4.71%-2.40% | -5.08%-3.16% | +21.96%+22.95% | +111.77%n/a | +94.55%n/a |
| Flows | TMFC QDVO | -$16M+$26M | +$67M+$129M | +$4M+$83M | +$412M+$594M | +$881M- | +$891M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TMFC QDVO | +13.20%+11.50% | +20.45%+17.73% | +17.70%n/a | +20.73%n/a |
| Max drawdown | TMFC QDVO | -6.22%-4.29% | -14.13%-12.44% | -20.32%n/a | -32.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | TMFC QDVO | 74d44d | 37d45d | 110dn/a | 718dn/a |
TMFC | QDVO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:33 PM | $68.36 | $27.62 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $69.14 | $27.97 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
TMFC | QDVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
TMFC | QDVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.36 | $27.62 |
| 1D performance | -1.13% | -1.24% |
| AuM | $1.84 B | $606.95 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.55% |
TMFC | QDVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Motley Fool Asset Management | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Motley Fool 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 44 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 30, 2018 | August 22, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TMFC and QDVO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, TMFC is down -5.08% year-to-date (YTD), while QDVO has lost -3.16%. That puts QDVO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TMFC or QDVO?
Year-to-date, the TMFC ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$83M for QDVO.
Which ETF is more volatile: TMFC or QDVO?
Over the past year, TMFC had a volatility of 20.45%, while QDVO experienced 17.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: TMFC or QDVO?
As of March 12, 2026, TMFC holds $1.84 B in assets under management (AUM), while QDVO manages $606.95 M.
What sectors do the TMFC and QDVO ETFs invest in?
TMFC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QDVO focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the TMFC ETF and QDVO ETF?
TMFC top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE. QDVO holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: TMFC or QDVO?
TMFC holds 100 securities with 59.54% of its assets in the top 15. QDVO has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.22%.
Amplify ETFs Unveils New Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) on NYSE Arca
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.