Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TMATvsQMOMETF Comparison
Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) belongs to the Multiple Trends segment. Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. TMAT's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, QMOM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. TMAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.29% for QMOM. TMAT is down -2.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. QMOM performs better with 6.95% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TMAT and QMOM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TMAT vs QMOM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TMAT QMOM | +1.25%-1.42% | -7.93%+3.70% | -2.64%+6.95% | +35.74%+24.83% | +89.89%+65.41% | +4.41%+32.73% |
| Flows | TMAT QMOM | -$476K+$856K | -$9M+$6M | +$3M+$5M | +$19M+$18M | +$34M+$149M | +$96M+$182M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TMAT QMOM | +22.80%+25.56% | +30.72%+24.70% | +27.78%+21.74% | +30.56%+24.64% |
| Max drawdown | TMAT QMOM | -12.13%-8.04% | -21.07%-14.73% | -33.46%-26.41% | -52.69%-26.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | TMAT QMOM | 90d9d | 46d50d | 129d414d | 1584d414d |
TMAT | QMOM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $24.18 | $68.01 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $24.34 | $69.79 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
TMAT | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.18 | $68.01 |
| 1D performance | -0.65% | -2.55% |
| AuM | $192.86 M | $369.92 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.29% |
TMAT | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Main Management ETF Advisors | Alpha Architect |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 86 | 47 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 29, 2021 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TMAT and QMOM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, TMAT is down -2.64% year-to-date (YTD), while QMOM has returned 6.95%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TMAT or QMOM?
Year-to-date, the TMAT ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$5M for QMOM.
Which ETF is more volatile: TMAT or QMOM?
Over the past year, TMAT had a volatility of 30.72%, while QMOM experienced 24.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: TMAT or QMOM?
As of March 10, 2026, TMAT holds $192.86 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMOM manages $369.92 M.
What sectors do the TMAT and QMOM ETFs invest in?
TMAT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, QMOM focuses on Industrials, Materials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the TMAT ETF and QMOM ETF?
TMAT top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, FAIR ISAAC and CLEAR SECURE. QMOM holds in its top three: ENERGY FUELS, COEUR MINING INC and GB00BRXH2664.
Which ETF is more diversified: TMAT or QMOM?
TMAT holds 88 securities with 26.39% of its assets in the top 15. QMOM has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.45%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
