Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TMATvsPFUTETF Comparison
Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) belongs to the Multiple Trends segment. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. TMAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.65% for PFUT. TMAT is down -2.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. PFUT performs worse with -4.39% YTD performance, and -$386M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TMAT and PFUT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TMAT vs PFUT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TMAT PFUT | +1.25%-3.10% | -7.93%-7.85% | -2.64%-4.39% | +35.74%+9.13% | +89.89%+42.01% | +4.41%n/a |
| Flows | TMAT PFUT | -$476K-$396M | -$9M-$380M | +$3M-$386M | +$19M-$329M | +$34M-$222M | +$96M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TMAT PFUT | +22.80%+16.94% | +30.72%+22.10% | +27.78%+18.49% | +30.56%n/a |
| Max drawdown | TMAT PFUT | -12.13%-9.19% | -21.07%-16.31% | -33.46%-27.52% | -52.69%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | TMAT PFUT | 90d90d | 46d45d | 129d462d | 1584dn/a |
TMAT | PFUT | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.15 | $24.22 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $24.34 | $24.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
TMAT | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.15 | $24.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.77% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $192.86 M | $4.84 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.65% |
TMAT | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Main Management ETF Advisors | Putnam |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 86 | 62 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 29, 2021 | May 25, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TMAT and PFUT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, TMAT is down -2.64% year-to-date (YTD), while PFUT has lost -4.39%. That puts TMAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TMAT or PFUT?
Year-to-date, the TMAT ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$386M for PFUT.
Which ETF is more volatile: TMAT or PFUT?
Over the past year, TMAT had a volatility of 30.72%, while PFUT experienced 22.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: TMAT or PFUT?
As of March 10, 2026, TMAT holds $192.86 M in assets under management (AUM), while PFUT manages $4.84 M.
What sectors do the TMAT and PFUT ETFs invest in?
TMAT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, PFUT focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the TMAT ETF and PFUT ETF?
TMAT top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, FAIR ISAAC and CLEAR SECURE. PFUT holds in its top three: VERTIV HOLDINGS, HILTON INC and PENUMBRA.
Which ETF is more diversified: TMAT or PFUT?
TMAT holds 88 securities with 26.39% of its assets in the top 15. PFUT has 64 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.36%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
