Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TMATvsGLRYETF Comparison
Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) belongs to the Multiple Trends segment. Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. TMAT's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, GLRY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. TMAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.96% for GLRY. TMAT is down -1.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. GLRY performs better with 7.68% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TMAT and GLRY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TMAT vs GLRY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TMAT GLRY | +2.29%-0.65% | -7.19%+4.77% | -1.56%+7.68% | +37.25%+35.18% | +87.18%+62.98% | +5.16%+40.54% |
| Flows | TMAT GLRY | -$476K+$3M | -$6M+$20M | +$3M+$19M | +$19M+$47M | +$34M+$57M | +$97M+$76M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TMAT GLRY | +22.72%+22.03% | +30.76%+21.35% | +27.81%+17.59% | +30.56%+20.40% |
| Max drawdown | TMAT GLRY | -12.40%-6.18% | -21.07%-12.46% | -33.46%-20.66% | -52.69%-34.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | TMAT GLRY | 90d12d | 46d37d | 129d209d | 1584d917d |
TMAT | GLRY | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.15 | $38.15 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $24.34 | $38.34 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
TMAT | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.15 | $38.15 |
| 1D performance | -0.77% | -0.50% |
| AuM | $195.00 M | $145.07 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.96% |
TMAT | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Main Management ETF Advisors | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 86 | 32 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 29, 2021 | August 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TMAT and GLRY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, TMAT is down -1.56% year-to-date (YTD), while GLRY has returned 7.68%. That puts GLRY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TMAT or GLRY?
Year-to-date, the TMAT ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$19M for GLRY.
Which ETF is more volatile: TMAT or GLRY?
Over the past year, TMAT had a volatility of 30.76%, while GLRY experienced 21.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: TMAT or GLRY?
As of March 9, 2026, TMAT holds $195.00 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLRY manages $145.07 M.
What sectors do the TMAT and GLRY ETFs invest in?
TMAT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GLRY focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the TMAT ETF and GLRY ETF?
TMAT top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, FAIR ISAAC and CLEAR SECURE. GLRY holds in its top three: AMPHENOL, KLA CORPORATION and CURTISS WRIGHT.
Which ETF is more diversified: TMAT or GLRY?
TMAT holds 88 securities with 26.39% of its assets in the top 15. GLRY has 32 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.93%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
