Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

TIERvsACWXETF Comparison

ETF 1
TIER

T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF

This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
-0.47%
VS
ETF 2
ACWX

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF

This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
-0.47%

T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. TIER is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.32% for ACWX. TIER is up 11.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. ACWX performs worse with 11.35% YTD performance, and +$2.48B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TIER and ACWX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

TIER vs ACWX performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27

Cumulative Flows

01,000,0002,000,0003,000,0004,000,0005,000,000Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
TIER
ACWX
-1.75%-2.29%
+3.37%+2.76%
+11.55%+11.35%
+24.15%+23.61%
n/a+57.29%
n/a+50.54%
Flows
TIER
ACWX
+$5M-
+$6M+$122M
+$9M+$2.48B
+$19M+$3.27B
-+$4.13B
-+$4.90B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
TIER
ACWX
+19.94%+19.98%
+16.74%+16.34%
n/a+14.74%
n/a+15.73%
Max drawdown
TIER
ACWX
-5.07%-5.36%
-12.14%-11.33%
n/a-13.37%
n/a-29.68%
Max drawdown duration
TIER
ACWX
15d15d
69d69d
n/a43d
n/a979d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
TIER
ACWX
Last sale
7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
$31.38
$73.94
Previous close
07/28/2026
$31.61
$74.43
Consolidated volume
07/28/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

TIER
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
TIER
ACWX
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
TIER
ACWX
Last price
$31.38
$73.94
1D performance
-0.72%
-0.66%
AuM$34.57 M$11.28 B
E/R0.38%0.32%
Characteristics
TIER
ACWX
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderT. Rowe PriceiShares
Benchmark-MSCI ACWI ex USA Index
N° of holdings3791787
Asset class-Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJune 25, 2025March 26, 2008
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

TIER
Japan
15.32%
Taiwan
9.85%
United Kingdom
8.7%
Canada
7.98%
Republic of Korea
7.43%
Other
50.73%
ACWX
Japan
13.7%
Taiwan
9.12%
Republic of Korea
7.92%
United Kingdom
7.87%
Canada
7.84%
Other
53.54%

Sectors

TIER
Finance
26.5%
Technology
25.88%
Industrials
11.75%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.16%
Other
28.71%
ACWX
Finance
26.13%
Technology
24.67%
Industrials
11.88%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.13%
Other
30.19%
Advertisement

Diversification

TIER

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

23.19%
ACWX

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

20.34%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026
TIER
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3.61%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.10%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.60%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.36%
ASML Holding NV
2.08%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.32%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.12%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.00%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.98%
MediaTek, Inc.
0.89%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.89%
Nestlé SA
0.88%
Siemens AG
0.86%
Roche Holding AG
0.75%
Novartis AG
0.74%
ACWX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.03%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.72%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.55%
ASML Holding NV
2.06%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.91%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.87%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.78%
Roche Holding AG
0.78%
Novartis AG
0.78%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.76%
Nestlé SA
0.72%
Siemens AG
0.64%
Shell Plc
0.59%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
0.57%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.57%
Frequently asked questions about TIER and ACWX

How have the TIER and ACWX ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 27, 2026, TIER is up 11.55% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWX has returned 11.35%. That puts TIER better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TIER or ACWX?

Year-to-date, the TIER ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$2.48B for ACWX.

Which ETF is more volatile: TIER or ACWX?

Over the past year, TIER had a volatility of 16.74%, while ACWX experienced 16.34%.

Which ETF is bigger: TIER or ACWX?

As of July 27, 2026, TIER holds $34.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWX manages $11.28 B.

What sectors do the TIER and ACWX ETFs invest in?

TIER leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWX focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the TIER ETF and ACWX ETF?

TIER top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. ACWX holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: TIER or ACWX?

TIER holds 380 securities with 23.19% of its assets in the top 15. ACWX has 1856 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.34%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up