Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
THROvsQYLGETF Comparison
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) belongs to the Multiple Trends segment. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. THRO's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, QYLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. THRO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.35% for QYLG. THRO is down -2.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$258M in YTD flows. QYLG performs better with 0.55% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of THRO and QYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
THRO vs QYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | THRO QYLG | -2.16%-0.20% | -3.00%+0.40% | -2.02%+0.55% | +20.22%+24.86% | +78.94%+83.06% | n/a+68.35% |
| Flows | THRO QYLG | +$214M-$264K | +$604M+$20M | +$258M+$8M | +$6.38B+$38M | +$6.86B+$62M | -+$137M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | THRO QYLG | +13.54%+12.72% | +18.22%+19.25% | +15.79%+15.92% | n/a+18.60% |
| Max drawdown | THRO QYLG | -5.02%-4.33% | -12.37%-13.82% | -19.10%-20.90% | n/a-30.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | THRO QYLG | 43d42d | 45d45d | 154d155d | n/a718d |
THRO | QYLG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.20 | $26.79 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $37.79 | $27.06 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
THRO | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
THRO | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.20 | $26.79 |
| 1D performance | -1.56% | -1.00% |
| AuM | $7.41 B | $137.61 M |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the THRO and QYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, THRO is down -2.02% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLG has returned 0.55%. That puts QYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: THRO or QYLG?
Year-to-date, the THRO ETF saw +$258M in flows, compared to +$8M for QYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: THRO or QYLG?
Over the past year, THRO had a volatility of 18.22%, while QYLG experienced 19.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: THRO or QYLG?
As of March 11, 2026, THRO holds $7.41 B in assets under management (AUM), while QYLG manages $137.61 M.
What sectors do the THRO and QYLG ETFs invest in?
THRO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, QYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the THRO ETF and QYLG ETF?
THRO top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: THRO or QYLG?
THRO holds 206 securities with 61.25% of its assets in the top 15. QYLG has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.14%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
