Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
THNQvsABOTETF Comparison
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) belongs to the AI & Big Data segment. Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is part of the US Large Cap segment. THNQ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, ABOT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. THNQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.59% for ABOT. THNQ is down -3.26% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. ABOT performs worse with -10.65% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of THNQ and ABOT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
THNQ vs ABOT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | THNQ ABOT | -3.21%-0.95% | -6.79%-13.39% | -3.26%-10.65% | +35.27%+2.73% | +102.75%+59.50% | +56.03%+47.71% |
| Flows | THNQ ABOT | -- | -$488K- | -- | +$60M-$3M | +$168M-$62M | +$172M-$84M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | THNQ ABOT | +25.11%+19.92% | +28.68%+21.50% | +24.10%+17.98% | +28.27%+19.61% |
| Max drawdown | THNQ ABOT | -11.09%-17.54% | -20.23%-18.72% | -29.80%-22.58% | -50.36%-29.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | THNQ ABOT | 40d89d | 45d134d | 149d134d | 1093d801d |
THNQ | ABOT | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.98 | $34.66 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $61.48 | $34.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
THNQ | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
THNQ | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.98 | $34.66 |
| 1D performance | +0.82% | -0.67% |
| AuM | $281.32 M | $4.36 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.59% |
THNQ | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ROBO Global ETFs | Abacus FCF Advisors |
| Benchmark | ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence | Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 11, 2020 | December 8, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the THNQ and ABOT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, THNQ is down -3.26% year-to-date (YTD), while ABOT has lost -10.65%. That puts THNQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: THNQ or ABOT?
Year-to-date, the THNQ ETF saw - in flows, compared to - for ABOT.
Which ETF is more volatile: THNQ or ABOT?
Over the past year, THNQ had a volatility of 28.68%, while ABOT experienced 21.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: THNQ or ABOT?
As of March 9, 2026, THNQ holds $281.32 M in assets under management (AUM), while ABOT manages $4.36 M.
What sectors do the THNQ and ABOT ETFs invest in?
THNQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Communication Services. Meanwhile, ABOT focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the THNQ ETF and ABOT ETF?
THNQ top holdings include US5128073062, USN070592100 and TWN SEMICONT MAN. ABOT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: THNQ or ABOT?
THNQ holds 47 securities with 38.39% of its assets in the top 15. ABOT has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.03%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
